Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANDEEP BHASKAR NAIKversusTHE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF THE CO OP. SOC. AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the amendment of the petition and dispensed with re‑verification.

Summary

The applicant, Mr. Sandeep Bhaskar Naik, filed an interim application seeking to amend his civil writ petition (No. 3533 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court. The amendment sought was detailed in Schedule A attached to the application. Respondents, represented by Mr. P.V. Nelson Rajan and Mr. Amey Shivalkar, raised no objection to the amendment. The Court, after noting the lack of opposition, allowed the interim application, directing that the amendment be effected on the same day and that re‑verification be dispensed with. The petitioner was instructed to file the amended petition and serve a copy on the respondents.

Issues considered

  • Whether the amendment to the civil writ petition may be permitted at the interim stage
  • Whether re‑verification of the amended petition is required

Subjects

  • interim application
  • amendment of petition
  • civil procedure
  • re‑verification
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

P.H. Jayani                                                        14(A) IA3751.2026.doc




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3751 OF 2026
                                   IN
                  CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3533 OF 2026

Mr. Sandeep Bhaskar Naik                                    …. Applicant
      Vs.
The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative
Societies, Dombivali and Ors.                               …. Respondents


Dr. Dhanalakshmi S. Krishnaiyer i/b. Ms. Deepa Panicker for the
Applicant/Petitioner.
Mr. P.V. Nelson Rajan, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State.
Mr. Amey Shivalkar i/b. Adv. Sujit Nikam for Respondent No.3.

                           CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK AND
                                   FARHAN P. DUBASH, JJ.

                           DATED : 01st JUNE, 2026
                                    (VACATION COURT)

P.C. :-

1)             Present Application is filed for amendment in the Petition as

per the ‘Schedule A’ attached to the Interim Application.

2)             Mr. Rajan, learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Mr.

Shivalkar, learned Counsel for Respondent No.3 have no objection to allow

the present Application, as prayed for.

3)             Hence, the Interim Application is allowed.

4)             Ms.   Krishnaiyer,   learned   Counsel       appearing   for     the

Applicant/Petitioner states that she will carry out the amendment during

the course of the day.


                                                                                      1/2
               P.H. Jayani                                                    14(A) IA3751.2026.doc


               5)            Hence, the amendment shall be carried out, accordingly.

               6)            Re-verification is dispensed with.

               7)            After the amendment is carried out, the Petitioner shall place

               on record the amended copy of the Petition with advance copy to the other

               side.




                       (FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.)                (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)

  PREETI
  HEERO
  JAYANI
Digitally signed by
PREETI HEERO
JAYANI
Date: 2026.06.02
16:02:24 +0530




                                                                                               2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.