Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VRUTIKA VASANTBHAI ROHITversusTHE UNION TERRITORY OF DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI AND DAMAN AND DIU

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition is granted.

Summary

The petitioner, Vrutika Vasantbhai Rohit, filed a writ petition seeking relief for the academic year 2025-26 and later applied for leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court considered the application for withdrawal. No substantive factual or legal dispute was examined beyond the procedural request. The Court granted leave to withdraw the writ petition and allowed the petitioner to file a fresh petition. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn and all pending interim applications were also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • liberty to file fresh petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • interim applications
  • procedural relief

Judgment

                                                                     1                    26-wp-11318-
                                                                                             2025..doc

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 11318 OF 2025
                                                      WITH
                                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38440 OF 2025

                    Vrutika Vasantbhai Rohit                                    ...Petitioner
                             Vs.
                    The Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar
                    Haveli and Daman and Diu and Others                          ...Respondents

                                                      -----------------

                    Ms. Varsha Palav, for the Petitioner in WP/11318/2025.
                    Dr. Sanjay Jain a/w. Mr. Harsh Dedhia, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
                    Mr. Ganesh K. Gole a/w. Mr. Kunjan Makwana, for Respondent No.4 (NMC)
                    in both Writ Petitions.
                                                      -----------------
        Digitally
        signed by
        MAMTA
MAMTA AMAR
AMAR KALE


                                                      CORAM :         R. I. CHAGLA AND
KALE  Date:
      2026.09.22
        11:24:31
        +0530




                                                                      FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.

                                                      DATED       : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026

                    P.C.:-

                    1.             Having considered that the prayers in the Petition are in

                    respect of Academic Year 2025-26, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner

                    seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition, with liberty to file a fresh Writ

                    Petition.

                    2.             Accordingly, leave is granted.

                    3.             The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as

                     Mamta Kale                                                                    1/2
                                           2                     26-wp-11318-
                                                                    2025..doc

prayed.

4.            In the event, the Writ Petition is filed in the course of this

week, the Writ Petition shall be placed for hearing at the admission stage on

28th September 2026.

5.            Brief written submissions shall also be filed by the adjourned

date.

6.            In view of disposal of the Writ Petition, pending Interim

Applications also do not survive and the same are disposed of.



     [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.]                          [R.I. CHAGLA, J.]




 Mamta Kale                                                               2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.