Bombay High Court
SHRIKANT GOPAL PARAB THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHANTI MAHESH PARAB AND ORS.versusPRADEEP RAMCHANDRA MOHITE AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The court allowed the filing of an additional affidavit with the death certificates and adjourned the matter to 24 February 2026.
Summary
The appellants filed an interim application to record the legal heirs of deceased appellant No.2 and No.7, who died during the COVID‑19 period and were not represented by counsel in the original suit. The respondents objected, noting that the death certificate of appellant No.2 was not on record. The appellants sought permission to file an additional affidavit containing the death certificate. The court directed that the affidavit be filed on or before 18 February 2026 and adjourned the matter to 24 February 2026 to consider the application further.
Issues considered
- Whether the death certificates of the deceased appellants can be placed on record through an additional affidavit
- Whether an adjournment should be granted to allow filing of the affidavit
Subjects
- interim application
- death certificate
- legal heirs
- adjournment
- civil appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
44-ia-38418-2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.38418 OF 2025
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.38416 OF 2025
Shrikant Gopal Parab ...Appellants
(Through POA Shanti Mahesh Parab) and Others
VISHAL
SUBHASH
PAREKAR Versus
Digitally signed by
VISHAL SUBHASH
PAREKAR
Date: 2026.02.02
Pradeep Ramchandra Mohite and Another ...Respondents
19:10:48 +0530
——————
Mr. Rajendra Singh a/w. Ms. Anita Phanse and Mr. Balraj Nishad, for the
Applicants/Appellants.
Mr. Sameer Logade, for the Respondents.
——————
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 02, 2026
P. C. :
1. Not on board. Taken on board.
2. The Interim Application has been preferred for bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased Appellant Nos. 2 and 7. Learned
counsel appearing for the Appellants submits that the Appellants No. 2
and 7 expired during Covid -19 period and during the pendency of the
Suit, they were not represented by Advocate which is one of the
ground taken in the First Appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that the death
Vishal Parekar 1 of 2
44-ia-38418-2025.doc
certi8cate of Defendant No. 2 i.e. the Appellant No. 2 is not on record.
4. Learned counsel for the Appellants seeks time to 8le additional
a9davit to place the death certi8cate on record.
5. The additional a9davit to be 8led on or before 18 th February,
2026.
6. Stand over to 24th February, 2026.
[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
Vishal Parekar 2 of 2
Checking your session…