Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ARIF AMAJADKHAN PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The amendment of the writ petition is allowed.

Summary

The applicant, Arif Amajadkhan Pathan, filed an interim application seeking amendment of his writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. The application was presented by counsel Mr. Satyajeet A. Rajeshirke, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by Ms. T. J. Kapre, A.G.P. The court considered the request and, without detailed factual exposition, allowed the amendment as per the prayer clause (a). No substantive issues of law or factual disputes were elaborated in the order. The judgment was delivered by Justices R.G. Avachat and Ajit B. Kadetankar on 23 January 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the interim application for amendment of the writ petition should be allowed

Subjects

  • interim application
  • amendment
  • writ petition
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                                         1084-IA-39-2026.doc


                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2026
                                                            IN
                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 13200 OF 2025


                      Arif Amajadkhan Pathan                                          … Applicant

                                                   Versus

                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                 … Respondents


                                                        ——————
                      Mr. Satyajeet A Rajeshirke for the Applicant.
                      Ms. T. J. Kapre, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State.
                                                        ——————

                                                            Coram :      R.G. AVACHAT &
                                                                         AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.

                                                            Date     :   23rd January 2026.

                      PER COURT :

                      1.        Mentioned out of turn.

                      2.        This an application for amendment in petition.

                      3.        For the reasons given in the Application the same is allowed in terms of

                      prayer clause (a).


TALLE
SHUBHAM
ASHOKRAO                   [ AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ]                        [ R.G. AVACHAT, J. ]
Digitally signed by
TALLE SHUBHAM
ASHOKRAO
Date: 2026.01.27
10:35:13 +0530


                      Shubham                               1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.