Bombay High Court
MR. AGNELLO MANVEL FERNANDESversusMR. TEJAS PATEL AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court allowed the applicant to withdraw 35% of the deposited compensation amount, subject to repayment if the appeal is decided in favour of the appellant.
Summary
The applicant, a 78‑year‑old disabled accident victim, filed an interim application seeking permission to withdraw a portion of Rs 7,71,573.26 deposited by the appellants in the Employees’ Compensation Court. The withdrawal request was based on a prior judgment dated 2 May 2024 directing the appellants to pay compensation, interest and a 50% penalty. The appellants appealed that judgment, arguing there was no employer‑employee relationship and that the award was based on erroneous facts. The High Court noted the applicant’s age, disability and immediate financial needs, and allowed withdrawal of 35% of the deposited amount, subject to refund if the appeal succeeds. The Court ordered the Commissioner of Employees’ Compensation to release the funds within two weeks and disposed of the interim application without costs.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant can be permitted to withdraw a portion of the compensation amount pending the outcome of the appeal
- Whether the appellant’s claim of no employer‑employee relationship affects the entitlement to the awarded compensation
Subjects
- Employees' Compensation
- interim relief
- partial withdrawal of funds
- appeal
- disability
- age
- compensation award
Judgment
902-IA-4199-26 IN FA.DOC
JYOTI
RAJESH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MANE
Digitally signed by
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
JYOTI RAJESH
MANE
Date: 2026.09.24
19:38:04 +0530
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4199 OF 2026
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1170 OF 2025
Mr. Agnello Manvel Fernandes ...Appellant
Versus
Mr. Tejas Patel And Ors. ...Respondents
_______
Mr. Ashok Tajane a/w. Ms. Ashwini Mehetre, for Appellant.
Mr. T.R.Yadav, for Applicant/Original Respondent.
_______
CORAM: AARTI SATHE, J.
DATE: 24 SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.
1. This interim application has been filed by the applicant praying for the
following reliefs:
a. That the Applicant be allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs. 7,71,573.26/-with
accrued interest deposited by the Appellants/Opponents in Application (ECA) NO.
137/C-37 of 2022 with the Commissioner of Employees Compensation and Judge
Fourth Labour Court Mumbai.
b. That accordingly necessary direction be given to the Registrar of the Commissioner
of Employees Compensation and Judge Fourth Labour Court Mumbai.
c. Any other order as deemed fit may be passed.
d. Cost may be provided.
2. The aforesaid Interim Application has been filed pursuant to the
judgment and order dated 2nd May 2024 passed by the learned Commissioner for
Employees’ Compensation and Judge, 4th Labour Court, Mumbai, in Application
(ECA) No. 137/C-37 of 2022, whereby the Appellants/original Opponents were
Page 1 of 4
Mane
902-IA-4199-26 IN FA.DOC
directed to jointly and severally pay the compensation amount, along with interest
thereon from the date of the accident until realization, and further to pay a penalty
of 50% of the compensation amount to the Applicant herein.
3. The Appellants have preferred the aforesaid First Appeal challenging the
judgment and order dated 2nd May 2024 on various grounds.
4. Upon perusal of the Interim Application and the impugned order, it is
evident that certain triable issues have been raised in the aforesaid First Appeal.
5. However, considering that the Applicant is presently 78 years of age and
has suffered disability on account of the accident, the Applicant submits that he is
in need of funds to meet his day-to-day expenses and for his sustenance. It is
further submitted that the Applicant is suffering from various health ailments and,
therefore, it is imperative that some amount be permitted to be withdrawn by him
to meet the aforesaid expenses.
6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant, Mr. Tajne, has
vehemently opposed the withdrawal of the aforesaid amount on the grounds
specifically set out in the affidavit-in-reply dated 21 June 2026, filed by Mr. Tejas
Patel, Partner of the Appellant-Firm.
7. It is submitted on behalf of the Appellant that there was, in fact, no
employer-employee relationship between the Applicant and the Appellant. It is
further submitted that the amount awarded by the learned Labour Court has been
arrived at on the basis of an erroneous appreciation of the facts and evidence on
record.
Page 2 of 4
Mane
902-IA-4199-26 IN FA.DOC
8. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submits that the
learned Labour Court has failed to appreciate that there was no evidence
whatsoever to establish that any appointment had been made in favour of the
Applicant. It is further submitted that the learned Labour Court has erroneously
held that the Applicant had taken treatment at the said hospital.
9. This Court is of the view that all the aforesaid issues would have to be
considered at the time of hearing of the First Appeal. However, having regard to
the submissions made by the Applicant in the Interim Application, his age, and the
fact that he has suffered disability on account of the accident, this Court is of the
view that it would be appropriate to allow the Interim Application to the extent of
permitting the Applicant to withdraw 35% of the amount deposited before the
learned Commissioner for Employees’ Compensation and Judge, 4th Labour
Court, Mumbai.
10. Learned counsel on behalf of the Appellant has submitted that an amount
of Rs.7,71,573/- has been deposited in the learned Commissioner for Employees’
Compensation and Judge, 4th Labour Court, Mumbai. Accordingly, the Applicant
is permitted to withdraw an amount of Rs.2,70,050.55ps, being 35% of the
amount deposited, along with accrued interest, if any.
11. Needless to observe that the amount so withdrawn by the Applicant shall
be subject to the final outcome of the present First Appeal. In the event the
Appellant succeeds in the First Appeal, the Applicant shall refund the aforesaid
Page 3 of 4
Mane
902-IA-4199-26 IN FA.DOC
amount to the Appellant, along with the interest accrued thereon, if any, and as
may have been paid to the Applicant.
12. The learned Commissioner for Employees’ Compensation and Judge,
4th Labour Court, Mumbai, is directed to release the aforesaid amount to the
Applicant within a period of two weeks from the date of this order.
13. The Interim Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs.
(AARTI SATHE, J.)
Page 4 of 4
Mane
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.