Bombay High Court
DYANESHWAR BALSHIRAM PAPDEversusPUNE MAHANAGAR PARIVAHAN MAHAMANDAL LTD
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The dismissal of the writ petitions is recalled and the petitions are restored.
Summary
The petitioners filed writ petitions that were dismissed by the trial court for failure to remove office objections. They subsequently filed interim applications seeking restoration of those dismissed petitions. The High Court, after considering the applications and noting that similar petitions had been restored and notices issued, ordered that the dismissals be recalled and the petitions restored. The court directed that notices be served to the respondent through RPAD and that the petitions be listed for hearing on 29 October 2026. The order also permitted the petitioners to supply postal stamps for the issuance of notices.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition dismissed for non‑removal of office objections can be restored on an interim application
Subjects
- interim application
- writ petition
- restoration
- office objections
- notice
- RPAD
Judgment
k 1/2 7 ia 4734.26 in wpst as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4734 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.33529 OF 2025
Satish Vitthal Yadav ....Petitioner/Applicant
V/S
Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd. ....Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4738 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.33534 OF 2025
Gorakh Eknath Bhandare ....Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Gorakh Eknath Bhandare ....Petitioner
V/S
Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd. ....Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4739 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.33531 OF 2025
Dnyaneshwar Balshiram Papde ....Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Dnyaneshwar Balshiram Papde ....Petitioner
V/S
Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd. ....Respondent
_________
Ms. Poonam Pal i/b Mr. Sachin Hande for Applicants/Petitioners.
__________
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 05 OCTOBER 2026.
katkam Page No. 1 of 2
k 2/2 7 ia 4734.26 in wpst as.doc
P.C.:
1. Interim Applications are filed for restoration of the Petitions
which are dismissed for non-removal of office objections. For the
reasons indicated in the Applications, the orders passed dismissing the
Petitions are recalled and the Petitions are restored. The learned counsel
appearing for the Petitioners/Applicants submits that in similar
Petitions notices are issued to the Respondent and that Petitions are
directed to be listed on 29 October 2026. Accordingly, issue notice in the
present Petitions as well. Notices to be served through RPAD. The
learned counsel for the Petitioners/Applicants to supply postal stamps to
the Registry for issuance of notices through RPAD. In addition to Court
notice, private notice is permitted.
2. List the Petitions on 29 October 2026.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
katkam
Signed by: Sudarshan R. Katkam Page No. 2 of 2
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 06/10/2026 11:20:51
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.