Bombay High Court
BEEF DEALERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED MEMBER, MR. RAISMIYA ABDUL AZIZ QURESHIversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND 3 ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court allowed the interim application and restored Interim Application No. 3 of 2025.
Summary
The Beef Dealers Welfare Association filed Interim Application No. 4808 of 2026 in Writ Petition (L) No. 8662 of 2023 against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, seeking the restoration of an earlier Interim Application No. 3 of 2025. The respondents opposed the application. After hearing counsel for both sides, the Court found that the grounds advanced by the applicant justified granting the relief sought in prayer clause ‘a’. Consequently, the Court ordered that Interim Application No. 3 of 2025 be restored. The Court further disposed of Interim Application No. 4808 of 2026. The order was pronounced by Justices M.S. Karnik and Sandesh D. Patil on 25 August 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether Interim Application No. 4808 of 2026 should be allowed and the earlier Interim Application No. 3 of 2025 restored?
Subjects
- interim application
- writ petition
- restoration
- municipal corporation
- beef dealers welfare association
Judgment
41-IA-4808-2026 IN IA-3-2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4808 OF 2026
IN
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 8662 OF 2023
Beef Dealers Welfare Association .....Applicant
Through its Authorized Member
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and .....Respondents
Ors.
.....
Mr. Gauraj Shah a/w Mr. Harjot Singh and Ms. Shaheen Siddiqui, for
the Applicant.
Mr. Rajshekhar Govilkar, Senior Cousnsel a/w Ms. Jyoti Mhatre i/b
Ms. Komal Punjabi, for the Respondent-BMC.
Mr. Ravindra Diwekar, Assistant Superintendent of Market, present in
Court.
..…
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
SANDESH D.PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 25th AUGUST 2026
P.C.:-
1. Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. Rajshekhar Govilkar, learned Senior Counsel opposed the
Application.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the Application, we are satisfied
Manisha 1/2
Digitally signed by
MANISHA MANISHA
BALKRISHNA
BALKRISHNA TALEKAR
TALEKAR Date: 2026.08.27
10:54:25 +0530
41-IA-4808-2026 IN IA-3-2025.doc
that the Interim Application deserves to be allowed in terms of
prayer Clause ‘a’. Accordingly, Interim Application No.3 of 2025
stands restored.
4. In view of above, Interim Application No.4808 of 2026 stands
disposed of.
(SANDESH D.PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Manisha 2/2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.