Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BEEF DEALERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED MEMBER, MR. RAISMIYA ABDUL AZIZ QURESHIversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND 3 ORS

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court allowed the interim application and restored Interim Application No. 3 of 2025.

Summary

The Beef Dealers Welfare Association filed Interim Application No. 4808 of 2026 in Writ Petition (L) No. 8662 of 2023 against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, seeking the restoration of an earlier Interim Application No. 3 of 2025. The respondents opposed the application. After hearing counsel for both sides, the Court found that the grounds advanced by the applicant justified granting the relief sought in prayer clause ‘a’. Consequently, the Court ordered that Interim Application No. 3 of 2025 be restored. The Court further disposed of Interim Application No. 4808 of 2026. The order was pronounced by Justices M.S. Karnik and Sandesh D. Patil on 25 August 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether Interim Application No. 4808 of 2026 should be allowed and the earlier Interim Application No. 3 of 2025 restored?

Subjects

  • interim application
  • writ petition
  • restoration
  • municipal corporation
  • beef dealers welfare association

Judgment

                                                     41-IA-4808-2026 IN IA-3-2025.doc


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4808 OF 2026
                                 IN
              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2025
                                 IN
              WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 8662 OF 2023
Beef Dealers Welfare Association              .....Applicant
Through its Authorized Member
              Versus

 Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and .....Respondents
 Ors.
                               .....
Mr. Gauraj Shah a/w Mr. Harjot Singh and Ms. Shaheen Siddiqui, for
the Applicant.

Mr. Rajshekhar Govilkar, Senior Cousnsel a/w Ms. Jyoti Mhatre i/b
Ms. Komal Punjabi, for the Respondent-BMC.

Mr. Ravindra Diwekar, Assistant Superintendent of Market, present in
Court.
                                 ..…
                           CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
                                      SANDESH D.PATIL, JJ.
                                    DATE   : 25th AUGUST 2026
P.C.:-

1.        Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant.


2.        Mr. Rajshekhar Govilkar, learned Senior Counsel opposed the

Application.


3.        For the reasons mentioned in the Application, we are satisfied

Manisha                                                                         1/2
              Digitally signed by
MANISHA    MANISHA
           BALKRISHNA
BALKRISHNA TALEKAR
TALEKAR    Date: 2026.08.27
              10:54:25 +0530
                                                41-IA-4808-2026 IN IA-3-2025.doc


that the Interim Application deserves to be allowed in terms of

prayer Clause ‘a’. Accordingly, Interim Application No.3 of 2025

stands restored.


4.        In view of above, Interim Application No.4808 of 2026 stands

disposed of.




(SANDESH D.PATIL, J.)                            (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




Manisha                                                                    2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.