Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CHINTRA BAPURAO GEDAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the interim application and disposed of it.

Summary

The applicants, Chintra Bapurao Gedam and Sagar Anandrao Gundav, filed a criminal bail application (No. 4618 of 2025) before the High Court of Bombay. An interim application (No. 4854 of 2025) was subsequently moved seeking relief pending the final decision on the bail petition. Counsel for the applicants, Mr. Ajinkya Udane and Mr. Tanmay Kate, presented their submissions before the bench. The State, represented by Ms. Dhanlaxmi Iyer, opposed the interim relief. After hearing the arguments, the Court found the applicant's submissions sufficient to grant the interim relief. Consequently, the interim application was allowed and the matter was disposed of on the same day.

Issues considered

  • What relief, if any, should be granted by the Court in the interim application filed in connection with the bail petition?

Subjects

  • interim application
  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

                                                                                           70-IA-4854-25.doc


                             S.S.Kilaje


                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                               INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4854 OF 2025
                                                                IN
                                            CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4618 OF 2025

                             Chintra Bapurao Gedam                                      … Applicant
                             IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
                             Sagar Anandrao Gundav                                      … Applicant
                              Versus
          Digitally signed
                             The State of Maharashtra                                   … Respondent
SONALI by SONALI

SATISH Date:
       SATISH KILAJE

KILAJE 2026.01.30
       10:31:38 +0700
                             _________________________________________________________________
                             Mr. Ajinkya Udane, Advocate for the Applicant.
                             Mr. Tanmay Kate, Advocate for the Applicant in BA/4618/2025.
                             Ms. Dhanlaxmi Iyer, APP for Respondent-State.
                             _________________________________________________________________

                                                                   CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                   DATE         :   28th JANUARY, 2026.
                             P.C. :

                             1.            Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

                             2.            Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant,

                             Interim Application is allowed and disposed of.



                                                                              (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.