Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Hanumant Vasudev MohiteversusThe State of Maharashtra

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court suspended the substantive sentence pending appeal, subject to the applicant furnishing a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with sureties.

Summary

Hanumant Vasudev Mohite was convicted under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to up to three years imprisonment with a fine, plus a one‑month simple imprisonment. The trial court had already suspended the sentence during the appeal and granted interim bail. The applicant filed an interim application seeking formal suspension of the substantive sentence and bail, arguing that he had previously been on bail and had not misused his liberty. The State opposed, fearing the applicant might abscond if released. The High Court, noting the short term of the sentence and the applicant’s prior compliance while on bail, ordered the substantive sentence to remain suspended pending appeal, subject to the applicant furnishing a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with sureties, and directed that bail bonds be filed before the Additional Sessions Judge.

Issues considered

  • Whether the substantive sentence should be suspended pending disposal of the appeal
  • Whether bail should be granted despite the State's concern of possible absconding

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • IPC 420
  • suspension of sentence
  • bail
  • appeal
  • short term sentence
  • personal bond

Judgment

                                                                                            45-IA-4857-2025.doc



                             N.S.Kamble


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4857 OF 2025
                                                          IN
                                          REVISION APPLICATION NO.544 OF 2025


                             Hanumant Vasudev Mohite                                    … Applicant
          Digitally signed
NILAM     by NILAM
          SANTOSH
SANTOSH   KAMBLE                   Versus
KAMBLE    Date: 2026.01.09
          11:27:21 +0530


                             The State Of Maharashtra                                   … Respondent
                             ________________________________________________________
                             Mr.Vikrant V. Phatate a/w Mr.Mahesh S. Arjun, for the Applicant.
                             Mr.Arfan Sait, APP for Respondent-State.
                             ________________________________________________________
                                                              CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

                                                              DATE            : 8th JANUARY, 2026

                             P.C. :

                             .            This is an application for suspension of sentence and for bail.

                             2.           Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned

                             Additional Public Prosecutor.

                             3.           The Applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable

                             under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’ for short). The

                             maximum sentence imposed on the Applicant is of 3 years with fine of

                             Rs.5,000/- indefault to suffer Simple Imprisonment for one month.

                                                                Page 1 of 3
                                                                 45-IA-4857-2025.doc



N.S.Kamble


The learned Additional Sessions Court/trial Court has suspended the

sentence during the appeal period and has granted interim bail to the

Applicant.

4.           During the trial the Applicant was on bail. It may take time

to dispose of the Appeal. Hence, requested to allow the Application.

5.           The learned APP strongly objected to allow the Application

on the ground that if the Applicant released on bail, he may abscond.

Hence, requested to reject the Application.

6.           Considering the submission of both learned counsel as well

as sentence imposed on the Applicant is short term sentence. During

trial Applicant was on bail.          He has not misused the liberty.

Considering these facts, the sentence is suspended till final disposal of

the Appeal.

7.           The Application is disposed of in the following terms.

                                  ORDER

              (i)      The    substantive       sentence   of   imprisonment

              awarded to the applicant is hereby suspended pending

              disposal of the appeal, subject to the applicant furnishing a

              PR bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two

                                  Page 2 of 3
                                                            45-IA-4857-2025.doc



N.S.Kamble


             sureties in the like amount.

             (ii)     The bail bonds to be furnished before the learned

             Additional Sessions Judge.

             (iii)    The Criminal Application is disposed of.



                                               (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                 Page 3 of 3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.