Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANNASAHEB BAPUSAHEB CHOUGULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the original complainant to intervene in Bail Application No. 740 of 2026.

Summary

The original complainant sought to intervene in Bail Application No. 740 of 2026 by filing Interim Application No. 490 of 2026. The intervenor's counsel, Mr. Gautam Pawar, requested permission for the complainant to be added as an intervenor, and both the applicant's and the State's counsel did not oppose the request. The Court examined whether the intervention was permissible under procedural rules. Finding no objection, the Court allowed the intervenor to join the bail proceedings and granted leave to amend the bail application accordingly. The interim application was subsequently disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the original complainant may be permitted to intervene in the pending bail application

Subjects

  • bail
  • intervention
  • interim application
  • criminal procedure
  • court permission

Judgment

                                                              15-IA-490-2026.doc



        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 490 OF 2026
                              IN
               BAIL APPLICATION NO. 740 OF 2026
Annasaheb Bapusaheb Chaugale                ...Intervenor
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Pranjal Sharadchandra Phadnis                         ...Applicant
        Versus
State of Maharashtra And Anr.              ...Respondents
_______________________________________________________________
Mr. Gautam Pawar, for the Intervenor.
Mrs. S. N. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. S. R. Ganbavale, Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application No.
740 of 2026.
_______________________________________________________________
                               CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                DATE : 8th September, 2026.
P.C. :


1.       Interim Application No. 490 of 2026 is not on Board. Upon

mentioning by Mr. Gautam Pawar, learned Advocate for the Intervenor,

this Application was taken on Board.



2.       By      the   present   Application,   the   Applicant      (Original

Complainant), is seeking intervention in Bail Application Number 740

of 2026.



3.       Prayer clause A reads as thus:




Arjun                               1
                                                                                        15-IA-490-2026.doc



                                  (A) Allow the present Intervention Application and permit the
                                  Intervenor / Original Complainant to intervene and assist the
                                  Court in Criminal Bail Application No. 740 of 2026;


                     4.      Mr. S. R. Ganbavale, learned Advocate for the Applicant and

                     Mrs. S. N. Deshmukh, learned APP for the Respondent - State, do not

                     oppose the said request made by Mr. Gautam Pawar, learned Advocate

                     for the Intervenor.



                     5.      In view of the no objection, this Application is allowed in terms

                     of prayer clause (A). Applicant is permitted to intervene in Bail

                     Application No. 740 of 2026.



                     6.      Mr. S. R. Ganbavale, learned Advocate for the Applicant in Bail

                     Application No. 740 of 2026, seeks leave to carry out the amendment

                     forthwith to add the Complainant as an Intervenor in Bail Application

                     Number 740 of 2026.



                     7.      Permission to add the Complainant as Intervenor in Bail

                     Application No. 740 of 2026, is granted. Amendment be carried out

                     forthwith.



                     8.      Interim Application No. 490 of 2026 is disposed of.



                                                                         (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
        Digitally
        signed by
        ARJUN
ARJUN   KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE   Date:
        2026.09.10   Arjun                                 2
        14:15:23
        +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.