Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRATAPRAO BABASAHEB PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court permitted the informant to intervene and allowed the amendment to implead the complainant as Respondent No.2.

Summary

The informant, Prataprao Babasaheb Patil, filed an interim application seeking to intervene in the anticipatory bail application of Namrata Vijaykumar Khot. The Court noted that the informant’s complaint led to the registration of Crime No.363 of 2024, and therefore allowed his intervention. The applicant’s counsel was also permitted to amend the bail application to implead the complainant as Respondent No.2. The amendment was ordered to be effected immediately. The interim application was consequently allowed and disposed of. No substantive merits of the anticipatory bail petition were decided in this order.

Issues considered

  • Whether an informant can be permitted to intervene in a criminal anticipatory bail application.
  • Whether the anticipatory bail application may be amended to implead the complainant as a respondent.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • intervention
  • amendment
  • criminal procedure
  • informant

Judgment

                                                                        1
                                                                                            56-IA-491-2026 (CR).DOC


                                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                       CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 491 OF 2026
                                                                    IN
                                               CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 334 OF 2026

                                  Prataprao Babasaheb Patil                    …........Intervenor/Applicant
                                  IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
                                  Namrata Vijaykumar Khot                      ……….Applicant
                                        VERSUS
                                  The State Of Maharashtra                     ….......Respondent

                                  _________________________________________________________________


                                  Mr. Umesh Pawar, for the Intervenor/Applicant.
                                  Mr. Ramnik P. Pawar i/b Mr. Parvej N. Nadaf, for the Applicant in
                                  ABA/334/2026.
                                  Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, APP, for the Respondent-State.
                                  API, Vibhavari Narayan Relekar, Ishwarpur Police Station, District: Sangli,
                                  present.

            Digitally
                                  _________________________________________________________________
            signed by
            SHANTANU
SHANTANU    SHANKARSA
SHANKARSA   DHUDUM
DHUDUM      Date:
            2026.08.24
            20:32:41
            +0530




                                                      CORAM       :   ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                                      DATE        :   24th AUGUST, 2026.
                                  P.C.

                                  1.          By the present application, the Informant seeks intervention in

                                  Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No. 334 of 2026.

                                  2.          Considering that the Intervenor is the Informant, at whose

                                  instance Crime No.363 of 2024 came to be registered with Islampur Police

                                  Station, District: Sangli, the present application deserves to be allowed.




                         Shantanu S. Dhudum
                                               2
                                                                    56-IA-491-2026 (CR).DOC


         Accordingly, the Intervenor is permitted to intervene in Criminal

         Anticipatory Bail Application No. 334 of 2026.

         3.           Mr. Ramnik Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant in

         Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No. 334 of 2026, seeks permission

         to   carry    out   an   amendment   forthwith   so   as     to   implead     the

         Complainant/Informant as party Respondent No.2 in Criminal Anticipatory

         Bail Application No.334 of 2026. Permission is granted. Amendment be

         carried out forthwith.

         4.           Interim Application No.491 of 2026 is allowed and disposed of

         accordingly.




                                                     ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




Shantanu S. Dhudum


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.