Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DARSHAN JITENDRA VEDversusBINDU JITENDRA VED

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that the amendment of the defendant's address may be allowed.

Summary

In Suit No. 220 of 2025, the plaintiff Darshan Jitendra Ved filed an interim application seeking a formal amendment to change the address of the defendant, Bindu Jitendra Ved. The application was filed without any objection from the defendant's counsel. The court examined the request and, noting the lack of opposition, found no procedural impediment to the amendment. Accordingly, the court allowed the interim application. It directed that the amendment be effected within one week and ordered the issuance of a fresh writ of summons reflecting the new address.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may permit a formal amendment to change the address of the defendant in an ongoing suit.

Subjects

  • amendment of pleadings
  • address change
  • interim application
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                       1/2                  49 IA-4973-2026.DOC




                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION


        Digitally
                                              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4973 OF 2026
        signed by
        SAIRAJ
SAIRAJ
SANJAY
        SANJAY
        KARANDE
                                                                   IN
KARANDE Date:
        2026.09.18
        16:00:10
                                                   SUIT NO. 220 OF 2025
        +0530




                     Darshan Jitendra Ved                                          … Applicant
                     In the matter between :
                     Jitendra Ved and Others                                       … Plaintiffs
                                     Vs.
                     Bindu Jitendra Ved                                            … Defendant
                                                            _______
                     Mr. Pratap Sampat, Mr. Bharti Suvarna i/b Ms. Aarti Suvarna for
                     Petitioner/Plaintiff.
                     Mr. Vivek M. Sharma, Ms. Harsha Masand i/b Mr. Vivek M. Sharma for
                     Defendant.
                                                            _______


                                                   CORAM           :         ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
                                                   DATE            :         17th September, 2026.


                     P.C.


                     1.       Interim Application seeks formal amendment of change of address of the


                     Defendant.


                     2.       There is no objection to the same.


                     3.       Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, the Interim


                     Application is allowed.



                     Sairaj
                                            2/2                49 IA-4973-2026.DOC


4.       Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today.


5.       Let the fresh writ of summons be issued.




                                                             (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)




Sairaj


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.