Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANJIT RANJIT CHASAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Summary

The High Court of Bombay heard Criminal Appeal No. 259 of 2026 and the accompanying interim applications seeking suspension of the appellant’s sentence and release on bail. The appeal had already been admitted, but the appellant’s counsel was absent, so the court could not consider the interim applications. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned and listed for hearing on 5 November 2026.

Subjects

  • interim application
  • suspension of sentence
  • bail
  • adjournment

Judgment

SMITA       Digitally signed by SMITA
            JOHNSON GONSALVES
JOHNSON     Date: 2026.10.09
GONSALVES   11:40:58 +0530




                   sg                                                                                         10.apeal(cri)259-26.docx


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                               CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 259 OF 2026
                                                           WITH
                                             INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 504 OF 2026
                                                             IN
                                               CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 259 OF 2026
                                                           WITH
                                             INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 505 OF 2026
                                                             IN
                                               CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 259 OF 2026

                   Sanjit Ranjit Chasa                                                                        … Appellant

                                        versus
                   The State of Maharashtra And Anr.                                                          … Respondents
                                                                            ----
                   None for the Appellant.

                   Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP, for Respondent No.1/State.

                   Mr. Gaurav Parkar, for Respondent No.2.
                                                ----
                                              CORAM:BHARATI DANGRE &
                                                      ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ.
                                               DATE: 8th OCTOBER, 2026
                   P.C.:


                   1.                   None for the Appellant.                     Heard Mr. Khan, learned APP

                   representing the Respondent/State and learned Counsel representing

                   Respondent No.2/the Complainant.


                                                                      Page 1 of 2
                                                         __________________________________________________

                                                              8th October, 2026
sg                                                                              10.apeal(cri)259-26.docx


      The appeal has already been admitted and is listed for hearing of

the interim application seeking suspension of sentence and release of

the Applicant on bail.

      However, in absence of the learned Counsel for the Applicant,

the interim application cannot be heard.

      List the matter on 5th November, 2026.




(ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.)                                                   (BHARATI DANGRE, J.)




                                        Page 2 of 2
                           __________________________________________________

                                 8th October, 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.