Bombay High Court
M/S HEAVEN DIAMONDS PVT LTDversusTHE DY REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION...
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court held that the erroneous reference to “First Appeals” should be read as “Interim Applications” and accordingly the interim applications are disposed of.
Summary
The Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed interim applications (Nos. 5194 and 5195 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay relating to First Appeals Nos. 592 and 593 of 2014. The applicant’s counsel observed that the order dated 23 July 2026 mistakenly recorded that “Both the captioned First Appeals are disposed of”. The court examined the objection and accepted that the wording was erroneous. It directed that the original order be read to state that “Both the captioned Interim Applications are disposed of”. No substantive merits of the appeals were addressed; the order was limited to correcting the record. Consequently, the two interim applications were deemed disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the wording of the order should be corrected to reflect disposal of the interim applications rather than the appeals
Subjects
- interim application
- procedural order
- record correction
- High Court
- ESIC
- civil procedure
Judgment
1/1 P-4-IA-5195-2026.DOC
Digitally IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
signed by
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMMAD AREEB
AREEB MOHD
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MOHD AKBAR
AKBAR Date:
2026.07.28
10:38:28
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5195 OF 2026
+0530
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 593 OF 2014
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5194 OF 2026
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 592 OF 2014
Employees State Insurance Corporation ...Applicant
Versus
M/s Heaven Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
_______
Mr. Shailesh S. Pathak for Applicant-ESIC.
_______
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 27th JULY, 2026
P.C.
1. Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on Board Speaking to the Minutes of
Order dated 23rd July, 2026. Learned counsel submits that notice of this
mentioning has been given to the other side. Statement is accepted.
2. Learned counsel points out that paragraph no. 4 of the Order dated 23 rd
July, 2026 incorrectly records that “Both the captioned First Appeals are
disposed of”, the same should be read as “Both the captioned Interim
Applications are disposed of”.
3. The Original Order dated 23rd July, 2026 shall be read accordingly.
[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]
Areeb
Checking your session…