Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUSHMA N NIRBHAVANEversusAI AIRPORT SERVICES LTD. FORMELY KNOWN AS AIR INDIA TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that sufficient cause was made out for the restoration of the dismissed writ petition.

Summary

The applicant, Sushma N Nirbhavane, filed an interim application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 2453 of 2024, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The court examined the averments in the application and heard counsel for the applicant. It was held that the applicant had shown sufficient cause to justify restoration of the dismissed petition. Consequently, the interim application was allowed, and the writ petition was restored for admission. The respondents' reply affidavit was ordered to be placed on record, and the petition was listed for admission on 7 October 2026. No costs were awarded.

Issues considered

  • Whether the dismissal of Writ Petition No. 2453 of 2024 for want of prosecution can be set aside on the ground of sufficient cause.

Subjects

  • restoration of writ
  • want of prosecution
  • interim application
  • civil procedure
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

          Digitally
          signed by
          AJIT
AJIT      RAMESH
RAMESH    PATHRIKAR
PATHRIKAR Date:
          2026.09.24
                                                                                                3-IA-5243-2026.DOC
          11:31:16
          +0530




                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                        INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5243 OF 2026
                                                               IN
                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 2453 OF 2024
                       Sushma N Nirbhavane                                      ...Applicant
                              Versus
                       AI Airport Services Ltd. Formely Known As
                       Air India Transport Services Ltd & Ors.                  ...Respondents
                                                           _______
                       Mr. Vijay Vaidya a/w Mahendra Agvekar, Shraddha Chavan for Applicant.
                       Ms. Nukshinaro i/b MV Kini & Co., for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
                                                                _______

                                                             CORAM:        G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                                           DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
                                                             DATE:         23rd SEPTEMBER 2026

                       P.C.

                       1.         This Interim Application is filed for restoration of Writ Petition No.2453 of

                       2024, which was dismissed for want of prosecution.

                       2.         Having perused the averments made in the application and having heard

                       learned Counsel for the applicant/petitioner, in our opinion, sufficient cause has

                       been made out for restoration of the writ petition.

                       3.         In view of the above, the Interim Application is allowed.

                       4.         Disposed of. No costs.

                       5.         It is informed that the Respondents have filed their reply affidavit to the

                       petition. Let the same be placed on record.

                       6.         List the petition for admission on 7th October 2026.




                       (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)                                    (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)


                                                             Page 1 of 1
                       Ajit Pathrikar


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.