Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VILAS RANGANATH KALEversusMUMBAI PORT AUTHORITY

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court restored the dismissed writ petition, finding sufficient cause for its restoration.

Summary

The petitioners, Vilas Ranganath Kale and others, filed an interim application seeking restoration of their writ petition (No.2187 of 2024) which had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The court examined the averments in the application and heard counsel for both sides. It held that sufficient cause was shown to justify restoring the dismissed writ petition. Accordingly, the interim application was allowed, directing the restoration of the writ petition and listing it for admission on 21 October 2026. No costs were awarded and the interim application was disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution should be restored on the basis of the interim application.

Subjects

  • restoration of writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • interim application
  • civil procedure
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

         Digitally
         signed by
         PRASHANT
PRASHANT VILAS
                                                                                          4-IA-5419-26-WP2187-24.DOC
VILAS    RANE
RANE     Date:
         2026.10.07
         19:36:40
         +0530


                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                           INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5419 OF 2026
                                                           IN
                                              WRIT PETITION NO.2187 OF 2024

                      Vilas Ranganath Kale                               ...Applicant
                      In the matter of
                      Vilas Ranganath Kale & Ors.                        ...Petitioners
                             Versus
                      Mumbai Port Authority and Ors.                           ...Respondents
                                                           _______
                      Mr. Dhanraj A. Lodha with Husna Ara, for Petitioner/Applicant.
                      Mr. Sudhendra Rao, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
                                                         _________
                                                        CORAM:          G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                                        Dr.NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

                                                          DATE:          6 October 2026.
                      P.C.


                      1.         This Interim Application is filed for restoration of Writ Petition

                      No.2187 of 2024 which was dismissed for want of prosecution.

                      2.         Having perused the averments as made in the application and having

                      heard learned Counsel for the parties, in our opinion, sufficient cause has

                      been made out for restoration of the writ petition. Hence, the Interim

                      Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a).

                      3.         Interim Application is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

                      4.         List the petition for Admission on 21 October 2026.




                      (Dr.NEELA GOKHALE, J.)                                     (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)



                                                          Page 1 of 1
                                                        6 October 2026
                      P.V.Rane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.