Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Cyrus Jamshed GuzderversusShirin Jamshed Guzder

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

A post‑grant amendment to the probate schedule may be allowed to give full effect to the original grant.

Summary

The applicants, Cyrus Jamshed Guzder & Ors., filed an interim application seeking a post‑grant amendment to the probate order dated 15 October 2020. After the grant, they discovered that the deceased, Shirin Jamshed Guzder, owned additional shares not listed in the original Schedule of Assets. A communication from AFN Technology dated 21 April 2026 disclosed the existence of those shares. The applicants, through counsel Ms. Jyoti Badgujar i/b Lakdawala & Co., requested that the court amend Schedule I to include the newly identified shares. Justice Arif S. Doctor, after hearing counsel, held that the amendment should be allowed to give full effect to the probate grant. The interim application was therefore allowed, with the amendment to be made forthwith and reverification dispensed with.

Issues considered

  • Whether a post‑grant amendment to a probate order can be permitted to incorporate assets discovered after the grant.

Subjects

  • probate
  • post‑grant amendment
  • interim application
  • schedule of assets
  • succession law

Judgment

                                                         1/2               25-IA-5487-2026 (OS).DOC



           Digitally
           signed by
           MOHAMMAD
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MOHAMMAD   AREEB
AREEB      MOHD
MOHD
AKBAR
           AKBAR
           Date:
                                   TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
           2026.10.07
           10:20:29
           +0530



                                    INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5487 OF 2026
                                                          IN
                                   TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 387 OF 2020

                 Cyrus Jamshed Guzder & Ors.                                          ...Applicants
                         Versus
                 Shirin Jamshed Guzder                                                ...Respondent
                                                      _______
                 Ms. Jyoti Badgujar i/b Lakdawala & Co. for Petitioners.
                                                      _______
                                            CORAM         :     ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
                                            DATE          :     5th OCTOBER, 2026


                 P.C.


                 1.      By this Interim Application, the Applicants seek a post-grant amendment

                 to the probate granted by this Court to the Applicants vide an Order dated 15 th

                 October, 2020.

                 2.      Learned Counsel for the Applicants points out that it was only after

                 issuance of the grant that the Applicants became aware that the deceased, i.e.

                 Shirin Jamshed Guzder, had certain other shares standing in her name.

                 3.      Learned Counsel has invited my attention to a communication dated 21 st

                 April, 2026 issued by AFN Technology to the Applicants, which sets this out. The

                 present Interim Application has been filed to enable the Applicants to include

                 the said shares in the Schedule of Assets.




                 Areeb
                                           2/2                25-IA-5487-2026 (OS).DOC



4.      Having heard learned Counsel for the Applicants and having perused the

Interim Application, I am satisfied that the present amendment ought to be

allowed in order to give full and complete effect to the grant of probate already

issued by this Court.

5.      Hence, the Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a),

which reads thus:

           “a. That the Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow an amendment to Schedule I
           of the Petition in accordance with the Draft Schedule of Amendment
           annexed thereto and marked as Exhibit “B” ofInterim Application along
           with consequential amendments thereto.”


6.      Amendments to be carried out forthwith. Reverification is dispensed with.




                                                      [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]




Areeb


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.