Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Vivek Kumar GedamversusPRERANA VIVEK GEDAM

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court held that the 91‑day delay in filing the revision application is condoned.

Summary

The applicant, Vivek Kumar Gedam, filed a revision application (ST) No. 2582 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court after a delay of 91 days. The applicant sought condonation of this delay through an interim application (No. 550 of 2025). The respondent, Prerana Vivek Gedam, opposed the condonation. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, considered the reasons provided by the applicant for the delay. Finding the explanations satisfactory, the court condoned the 91‑day delay, allowed the interim application, and ordered that the revision application be registered. The matter was disposed of on the same day.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 91 days in filing a revision application can be condoned under the applicable procedural law

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • revision application
  • interim relief
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                            40-IA-550-2025 (CR).doc

                            S.S.Kilaje


                                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 550 OF 2025
                                                                      IN
                                                   REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO. 2582 OF 2025

                                     Vivek Kumar Gedam                                          ...Applicant/s
SONALI
         Digitally signed
         by SONALI
         SATISH KILAJE
                                           VERSUS
SATISH   Date:

KILAJE
         2026.09.29
         11:49:50
         +0530
                                     Prerana Vivek Gedam                                        ...Respondent/s


                                         _________________________________________________________________

                                     Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Advocate for Applicant.
                                     Mr. Balasaheb Ligade, Advocate for Respondent (Through VC).
                                     Mr. S. M. Mangaonkar, APP for Respondent-State.
                                     _________________________________________________________________

                                                                         CORAM        : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                         DATE         : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                                     P.C. :

                                     1.          Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

                                         2.      Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the

                                     applicant and reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 91 days for

                                     filing the Revision Application is condoned. The Interim application is

                                     allowed and disposed of.

                                     3.          The Revision Application be registered.



                                                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                      Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.