Bombay High Court
META PLATFORMS INCversusPeople Interactive India Private Limited
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court condoned the delay and permitted Defendant No.3 to file its written statement.
Summary
The plaintiff, People Interactive India Private Ltd., filed suit against Meta Platforms Inc. and others. Meta Platforms, as Defendant No.3, sought condonation of delay in filing its written statement. The plaintiff chose not to oppose the application, leaving the matter to the court. Justice Arif S. Doctor held that sufficient cause was shown, noting Meta's status as a US‑based platform, and ordered that the written statement be accepted. The interim application was therefore allowed, and the matter was stood over for further hearing on 18 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay in filing the written statement of Defendant No.3 can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code
- Whether sufficient cause for the delay has been demonstrated
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- written statement
- interim application
- Civil Procedure Code
- platform liability
Judgment
1/2 43 IA-5576-2025.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5576 OF 2025
IN
SUIT NO. 18 OF 2025
Meta Platforms INC … Applicant
In the matter of :
People Interactive India Private Limited … Plaintiff
Vs.
Ms. Nibha Singh and Others … Defendants
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6090 OF 2025
IN
SUIT NO. 18 OF 2025
_______
Mr. Rishabh Jaisani and Mr. Abhishek Mookherjee i/b Shardul Amarchand
Mangaldas for Applicant/Defendant No. 3.
Ms. Letishiya Chaturvedi i/b Veritas Legal for original Plaintiff.
_______
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 17th September, 2026.
P.C.
Interim Application No. 5576 of 2025 :
1. Interim Application seeks condonation of delay in filing of Written
Statement of Defendant No. 3.
Sairaj
2/2 43 IA-5576-2025.DOC
2. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff has taken a very fair stand and submits
that the Plaintiff does not wish to file reply affidavit to oppose the Interim
Application but leaves it to Court to ascertain whether sufficient cause has been
shown to have the delay condoned.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the Applicant and having considered
paragraph no. 5 of the Interim Application, in my view, sufficient cause has
been shown. It cannot be lost sight of the fact that the Applicant is a platform on
which the material is published and is based in United States. In my view, the
substantive interest of justice would best be served if delay is condoned and
Defendant No. 3 is permitted to contest the suit on merits.
4. Registry to accept the Written Statement accordingly.
5. Interim Application is allowed.
Interim Application No. 6090 of 2025 :
6. Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board.
7. Stand over to 18th September, 2026.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Sairaj
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.