Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LAXMAN AMRUTA DHIKALEversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE PRESIDING OFFICER OF APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR MAINTENANCE ,NASHIK AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The interim application is allowed and the writ petition is restored to the file.

Summary

The applicant, Laxman Amruta Dhikale, filed Writ Petition No. 4638 of 2021 seeking maintenance and subsequently moved an interim application. The High Court, after considering the prayer clause (B) of the application, allowed the interim relief. The court restored the writ petition to the file and noted that Respondent No. 3 had died during the pendency of the proceedings. The learned Additional Government Pleader sought time to verify the applicant's statement regarding the death. Consequently, the court ordered that the petition be listed for further hearing on 19 October 2026.

Issues considered

  • What interim relief, if any, should be granted pending the death of a respondent in a maintenance writ petition?

Subjects

  • interim relief
  • writ petition
  • maintenance
  • death of respondent
  • listing
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

                                                                                27-ia-6282-2026.doc


                        Vivekanand
                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           Digitally
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
           signed by
           VIVEKANAND
VIVEKANAND RAJENDRA
RAJENDRA   BONDE
BONDE      Date:
           2026.10.05
                                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6282 OF 2026
           18:53:14
           +0530                                       IN
                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 4638 OF 2021


                        Laxman Amruta Dhikale                         … Applicant
                                    V/s.
                        District Magistrate Presiding
                        Officer Of Appellate Tribunal
                        For Maintenance, Nashik And
                        Ors                                           … Respondents


                        Mr. Manoj Bagal, for the Applicant.
                        Smt. S. D. Chipade, Additional G. P., for the State-
                        Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
                        Adv. Dewang Mhatre i/b Adv. Aloukik Pai, for the
                        Respondent No. 3, through Legal Aid.


                                                     CORAM      : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                                                     DATED      : OCTOBER 5, 2026
                        P.C.:

                        1.      For the reasons stated therein, the interim application is
                        allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

                        2.      Writ Petition No.4638 of 2021 stands restored to the file.

                        3.      It is stated that during the pendency of the proceedings,
                        Respondent No. 3 has died. The learned AGP, seeks time to
                        ascertain whether the statement made by the Applicant is correct.




                                                           1
                                                   27-ia-6282-2026.doc


4.   To enable her to take instructions, list the Petition on 19
October 2026.


                                         (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                               2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.