Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S. DJS LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. AND ORSversusTHE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the delay was condonable and the order refusing registration of the writ petition was recalled.

Summary

M/s. DJS Logistics Pvt. Ltd. and others filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay and removal of an office objection that had led to the refusal to register their writ petition. The respondents, the Joint Commissioner of Customs and others, opposed the application. The Court examined the reasons for the delay and the oral submissions made by the parties. It held that the delay was condonable and that the earlier order refusing registration for non‑removal of the office objection should be set aside. Consequently, the Court allowed the interim application, recalled the earlier order, restored the writ petition to the file, directed the removal of office objections within two weeks, and fixed a date for listing the petition. The decision restores the petitioners’ right to proceed with their writ petition against the customs authorities.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in filing the application for condonation can be condoned
  • Whether the order refusing registration of the writ petition for non‑removal of office objection can be recalled

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • office objection
  • writ petition
  • customs
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • interim relief

Judgment

             Digitally signed
             by ARUNA
ARUNA     SANDEEP
SANDEEP   TALWALKAR
TALWALKAR Date:
             2026.09.29                                               33.IA6313.2026.odt
             19:17:06 +0530




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                        INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6313 OF 2026
                                         IN
                         WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.38128 OF 2025

 M/s. DJS Logistics Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.                           … Applicants.
      Versus
 The Joint Commissioner Of Customs & Ors.                      … Respondents

                                         --------------

 Mr. Vinayak Garje, Advocate for Applicants.

 Mr. Ram Ochani, a/w. Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Advocate for
 Respondents.
                      --------------

                                          CORAM :         M. S. KARNIK &
                                                          SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                            DATE :        29th SEPTEMBER, 2026

 P.C. :


 1.              Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicants.

 2.              For the reasons mentioned in the Application and in view

 of the oral submissions, the Application is allowed. The delay is

 condoned. The order dated 20/2/2026 refusing registration of the

 Writ Petition for non removal of the office objection is recalled.

 The Writ Petition is restored to file.


 Talwalkar                                 1
                                                          33.IA6313.2026.odt



3.          Office objections be removed within a period of two

weeks from today.

4.          List the Petition on 26th October, 2026.



(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                           (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




Talwalkar                         2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.