Bombay High Court
PRABHAKAR VITHOBA DHANEversusThe Superintendent of Police
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court permitted the Intervenor to intervene in Bail Application No.907 of 2026.
Summary
The Intervenor, who is the original complainant, filed an interim application seeking to be allowed to intervene in Bail Application No.907 of 2026. The Applicant’s counsel, Mr. Sampatrao H. Pawar, stated that the Applicant had no objection to the Intervenor’s participation. The State’s counsel, Mr. C. D. Mali, also did not oppose the request. The Court, noting the lack of objection from both parties, permitted the Intervenor to intervene and authorized an amendment to the bail application to reflect this change. The permission to amend was granted and the interim application was subsequently disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the original complainant may be permitted to intervene in the pending bail application.
Subjects
- bail
- intervention
- interim application
- criminal procedure
- court order
Judgment
1/2
503-IA-634-2026(CR).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.634 OF 2026
IN
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.907 OF 2026
Prabhakar Vithoba Dhane ….Intervenor
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Hanmant Tanaji Suryawanshi ….Applicant
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ....Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, for the Intervenor.
Digitally
signed by
SHANTANU
SHANTANU SHANKARSA
Mr. Sampatrao H. Pawar a/w Dr. Shrikant M. Kulkarni, Mr. Kaustubh R.
SHANKARSA DHUDUM
DHUDUM Date:
2026.10.07
20:49:33
+0530
Dhongade and Mr. Pankaj S. Dhanavade, for the Applicant.
Mr. C. D. Mali, A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State.
PSI, Mr. Vikas More, Kadegaon Police Station, Sangli, present.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C.
1. By the present Interim Application, the Intervenor (Original
Complainant) seeks intervention in Bail Application No.907 of 2026.
2. Mr. Sampatrao H. Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant in
Bail Application No.907 of 2026, in all fairness, states that the Applicant
Shantanu S. Dhudum
2/2
503-IA-634-2026(CR).DOC
has no objection to permitting the Intervenor to intervene in Bail
Application No.907 of 2026.
3. Mr. C. D. Mali, learned A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 –
State, does not oppose the request made in this Application.
4. In view of the no objection, the Intervenor is permitted to
intervene as an “Intervenor” in Bail Application No.907 of 2026.
5. Mr. Sampatrao H. Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant
seeks permission to carry out amendment to add the Intervenor as an
“Intervenor” in Bail Application No.907 of 2026. Permission is granted.
Amendment be carried out.
6. Criminal Interim Application No.634 of 2026 is disposed of.
( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
Shantanu S. Dhudum
Checking your session…