Bombay High Court

KONDIBA BABAN GUJARversusMAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Decided: 18 August 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the interim application should be allowed as per the prayer clauses ‘a’ and ‘b’.

Summary

The matter before the Bombay High Court is Interim Application No. 6347 of 2026 filed in Review Petition (ST) No. 38434 of 2025 and First Appeal No. 53 of 2026. The applicant, Kondiba Baban Gujar, seeks relief against Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation through its Executive Engineer. The application was presented by Ms. Amrita Kharkar together with Ms. Sayalee Bhosale, instructed by P. H. Potnis, on behalf of the appellant. The respondent was represented by Mr. A. R. Patil, Additional Government Pleader for the State. The Court, after considering the prayer clauses ‘a’ and ‘b’ of the application, allowed the interim relief sought. Accordingly, the application was disposed of in the manner ordered.

Subjects

interim application
review petition
civil appellate jurisdiction
Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                       100-IA-6347-2026.doc


Sayali
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6347 OF 2026
                             IN
           REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 38434 OF 2025
                             IN
                 FIRST APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2026
Kondiba Baban Gujar                           … Applicant
           V/s.
Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development
Corporation Through its Executive
Engineer                                      … Respondent

Ms. Amrita Kharkar with Ms. Sayalee Bhosale i/b P. H.
Potnis, for Appellant.
Mr. A. R. Patil, Additional G. P for State.

                             CORAM      : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                             DATED      : AUGUST 18, 2026
P.C.:

            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6347 OF 2026

1.         For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘a’ and ‘b’.

2.       The application is allowed and disposed of.




                                              (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                                   1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…