Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JAIKUMAR DASHRATH JAYAversusRUPESH BABANRAO THORAT

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the arbitrator’s mandate may be extended for a period of four weeks to enable the award to be pronounced.

Summary

The petition involves an interim application filed by the applicant, Jaikumar Dashrath Jaya, seeking an extension of the arbitrator's mandate as the arbitrator has completed the proceedings and is awaiting the pronouncement of the award. The learned arbitrator requested a four‑week extension via email. The High Court examined whether such an extension is permissible under the arbitration framework. Considering that the award has not yet been pronounced and the arbitrator requires additional time, the Court granted the extension. Consequently, the interim application was disposed of by extending the arbitrator’s mandate for four weeks from the date of the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the arbitrator’s mandate may be extended for a further period pending the pronouncement of the award

Subjects

  • Arbitration
  • Interim application
  • Extension of mandate
  • Award pronouncement
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                             906-ia-6563-26.doc

    Urmila Ingale

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
         Digitally
         signed by
         URMILA
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
URMILA   PRAMOD
PRAMOD   INGALE
INGALE   Date:
         2026.09.21
         11:57:13
                                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6563 OF 2026
         +0530
                                                   IN
                                   ARBITRATION PETITION NO.17 OF 2021

                      Jaikumar Dashrath Jaya                          .. Applicant
                      In the matter between

                      Jaikumar Dashrath Jaya                          .. Petitioner
                                Versus
                      Rupesh Babanrao Thorat and anr.                 .. Respondents
                                               ....................
                       Mrs. Prachi Raj Mhatre, for Applicant.
                       Mr.Vedant Tiwari i/b Mr.Rohit D. Joshi, for Respondents.
                                                  ...................
                                                  CORAM : S.M.MODAK, J.

                                                  DATE      : SEPTEMBER 18, 2026
                      P.C.:

                      1.        Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned

                      counsel for the Respondents. It is informed that learned

                      Arbitrator has completed the proceedings and is now at the stage

                      of pronouncement of the Award.          Letter seeking extension by

                      learned Arbitrator is by way of an email on page no. 22.


                      2.        In view of that, Interim Application is disposed of by

                      extending the mandate of arbitral Tribunal for a period of 4

                      weeks from today.


                                                                      [ S.M.MODAK, J. ]

                                                                                        1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.