Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KERSI JAMSHED LIMATHWALLAversusDISTRICT GRAND LODGE OF INDIA S.C. THR. ITS SECRETARY NOSHIR PAGHDIWALA AND OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court, suo moto, corrected the order to reflect the proper interim application number and the correct list of counsel for the appellant.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay, on suo moto basis, noted clerical errors in an earlier order dated 31 August 2026. The errors pertained to the numbering of an interim application and the listing of counsel appearing for the appellant. The court directed that Interim Application No.11988/2024 be corrected to Interim Application No.6620/2026 and that the names of the advocates for the appellant be substituted as specified. No substantive issues of law or fact were addressed; the correction was purely administrative. The remainder of the original order was left unchanged and the corrected order was to be made available to the parties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court should correct the clerical errors in the order regarding the interim application number and the list of counsel

Subjects

  • clerical correction
  • court order
  • interim application
  • suo moto correction
  • advocate substitution

Judgment

 JYOTI
 RAJESH
 MANE
Digitally signed by
JYOTI RAJESH
MANE
Date: 2026.09.09
16:10:01 +0530


                                              1/1                4-AO-880-26 SPK.doc


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 880 OF 2026
                                                       WITH
                                        INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6620 OF 2024
                                                        IN
                                         APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 880 OF 2026

                      Kersi Jamshed Limathwalla                                ...Appellant
                             Versus
                      District Grand Lodge Of India
                      S.C. Thr. Its Secretary Noshir
                      Paghdiwala And Others                                    ...Respondents
                                                           _______

                                                    CORAM:      AARTI SATHE, J.

                                                       DATE:    09 SEPTEMBER 2026
                      P.C.:
                      1        Suo moto called for Speaking to the Minutes of order dated 31 August
                      2026.
                      2        The Interim Application No.11988/2024 be corrected as Interim
                      Application No.6620/2026 in the title of the said order. So also the appearance
                      of Advocates appearing on behalf of the Appellant be corrected and substituted as
                      follows:
                              “Mr. Sharan Jagtiani Senior Advocate a/w. Mr.Karl Tamboly a/w.
                              Mr.Shanay Shah, Mr. Zerick Dastur, a/w. Mr. Pranav Narsaria, a/w
                              Mr.Sangram Parab, a/w. Mr. Ryan D’SOuza a/w. Mr. Tejas Popat a/w.
                              Ms. Mansi Shah i/b. M/s.Pravin Mehta and Mithi & Co., for
                              Appellant.”
                      3        Rest of the order remains unaltered. Original order to be corrected and
                      made available to the parties.

                                                                           (AARTI SATHE, J.)


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.