Bombay High Court
KISHOR NANA KINIversusTHE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SU MAHILA SAHAKARI BANK LTD THROUGH MANAGER SOU KALPANA APPASO AMBULKAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The Court allowed the interim application, permitting recall of the registration refusal order subject to removal of office objections within two weeks.
Summary
Kishor Nana Kini filed an interim application seeking recall of the Registrar Judicial‑I's order dated 08.05.2026 which refused registration of his writ petition on the ground of unremoved office objections, and also prayed for condonation of delay in moving the restoration application. The Court examined whether the order could be set aside and whether the delay could be condoned. Relying on the reasons set out in the petition, the Court was inclined to allow the relief sought. The application was allowed, directing that the office objections be removed within two weeks, thereby permitting registration of the original petition. The order thus restores the petitioner's right to proceed with the writ petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the order refusing registration of the writ petition on account of office objections can be recalled
- Whether the delay in moving the application for restoration can be condoned
Subjects
- registration of petition
- office objections
- condonation of delay
- interim application
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
varsha 14-IA-6667-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6667 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.6911 OF 2026
Kishor Nana Kini .. Applicant/Petitioner
V/S.
The Competent Authority And .. Respondent
Su Mahila Sahakari Bank Ltd
Through Manager Sou Kalpana
Appaso Ambulkar
-------------------
Mr. S.S. Redkar with Krupali Shetty and Nitin Bhoir, Yogesh Rawool
and Mrunmayee Phadke, for the petitioner.
VARSHA
DEEPAK
Ms. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP, for the State.
GAIKWAD
Digitally signed by
VARSHA DEEPAK
--------------------
GAIKWAD
Date: 2026.08.31
17:49:13 +0530
CORAM : MANISH PITALE &
SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
DATE : 31st AUGUST 2026.
PC:
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant (original petitioner).
2. By this application, the applicant seeks recall of the order dated
08.05.2026 passed by the Registrar Judicial-I whereby registration of
the petition itself was refused on account of failure to remove office
objections. The applicant is also praying for condonation of delay in
moving application for restoration.
3. For the reasons stated in Paragraphs 3 to 6 of the application, we
are inclined to allow the same.
1 of 2
varsha 14-IA-6667-2026.doc
4. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses
(a) and (b), subject to office objections being removed within two
weeks from today.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)
2 of 2
Checking your session…