Bombay High Court
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HETAVANE KALVA VIBHAG, RAIGADversusGIRJABAI SAKHARAM BHALEKAR (DIED) AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court allowed the condonation of delay and granted the interim relief, disposing of both applications.
Summary
The Executive Engineer Hetavane Kalva Vibhag Karmarli appealed against a decree in a civil matter involving the estate of the late Girjabai Sakharam Bhalekar and others. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant filed Interim Application No. 6703 seeking condonation of delay, and Interim Application No. 6704 seeking interim relief after depositing the entire decretal amount with interest. The High Court examined the reasons for the delay and the fact that the decree amount had been fully paid. It held that the condonation of delay was justified and allowed the application under prayer clause ‘b’. It also granted the interim relief sought in the second application, noting the full payment of the decree, and disposed of both applications.
Issues considered
- Whether the court should condone the delay in filing the interim application.
- Whether interim relief should be granted after the appellant has deposited the full decretal amount with interest.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- interim relief
- decretal amount
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
92-FAst-33348-24+.doc
Sayali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SAYALI FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.33348 OF 2024
DEEPAK
UPASANI WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6704 OF 2025
Digitally signed
by SAYALI
DEEPAK
WITH
UPASANI
Date: 2026.10.06
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6703 OF 2025
15:48:54 +0530
The Executive Engineer Hetavane Kalva
Vibhag Karmarli … Appellants
V/s.
Girjabai Sakharam Bhalekar Deced. And
Others … Respondents
Mr. Yogesh Thorat i/b Mr. Shakuntala Wadekar, for
Appellant.
Mr. A. R. Patil, Additional GP for State-Respondent
nos. 6 and 7.
Mr. Sarvesh Deshpande i/b Vishal H. for Respondent
nos. 21, 22 and 23.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : OCTOBER 06, 2026
P.C.:
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6703 OF 2025
1. For the reasons stated in paragraph nos. 15 to 19, the
application for condonation of delay is allowed in terms of prayer
clause ‘b’.
2. The application is allowed and disposed of.
1
92-FAst-33348-24+.doc
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.33348 OF 2024
3. Admit.
4. Paper book is to be filed within period of one year.
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6704 OF 2025
5. Since the Appellant has already deposited entire decretal
amount along with interest. Hence, there shall be interim relief,
in terms of prayer clause ‘b’.
6. The application is disposed of.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.