Bombay High Court
MR. DAGU RAMA TAMBE AND ANRversusTHE MAHANAGAR CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. THRU SPECIAL RECOVERTY OFFICER AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The review petition is rejected as the court found no error on the face of the record.
Summary
The applicants filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 13‑day delay in filing their review petition. The High Court, after considering the application, condoned the delay. The review petition was then heard, and the court examined whether there was any error apparent on the record in the order dated 3 July 2026. Finding no such error, the court rejected the review petition. Consequently, the interim application was disposed of and the review petition dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 13 days in filing a review petition can be condoned.
- Whether the order dated 3 July 2026 contains any error warranting a review.
Subjects
- review petition
- condonation of delay
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- procedural law
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:36200
Megha 8_ia_6378_2026 with rpwst23966_22026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6738 OF 2026
IN
REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.23966 OF 2026
IN
REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.23966 OF 2026
Dagu Rama Tambe and Anr. ...Applicants/Plaintiffs
V/s.
The Mahanagar Co-operative Bank
Limited and Ors. ...Respondents
________________
Mr. Rameshwar Totala with Adv. Iqra Qureshi i/b. Mr. Adesh Agarkar for
the Applicants.
Mr. Prashant Sarwankar i/b. M/s. Sarwankar & Co. for the Respondent-
BMC.
Mr. Hamid Mulla, AGP for Respondent-State.
________________
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 2 SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C.:
Interim Application No.6738 OF 2026:-
1) Application is filed for condonation of delay of 13 days in filing
the Review Petition. With a view to ensure that the Applicant does not
have any grievance that the Review Petition is not decided on merits, I
Page No.1 of 2
2 September 2026
Megha 8_ia_6378_2026 with rpwst23966_22026
deem it appropriate to condone the delay. Delay of 13 days in filing the
Review Petition is accordingly condoned.
2) Interim Application is accordingly disposed of.
Review Petition (stamp) NO.23966 OF 2026:-
3) I have heard Mr. Totala, the learned counsel appearing for the
Review Petitioner. This Court is unable to notice any error on the face of
record in the order under review dated 3 July 2026.
4) Review Petition is accordingly rejected.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
Signed by: Megha S. Parab
Page No.2 of 2
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge 2 September 2026
Date: 03/09/2026 16:04:13
Checking your session…