Bombay High Court
PRATIKSHA RAMCHANDRA CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The interim application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant filed an interim application in the High Court of Bombay but showed no interest in prosecuting it. No arguments or evidence were presented by the applicant. The court noted the lack of prosecution and, accordingly, dismissed the interim application. The dismissal was based solely on the applicant’s failure to pursue the matter. No substantive merits of the case were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether an interim application can be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- interim application
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- civil procedure
Judgment
7-IA-6784-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6784 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 40319 OF 2025
Pratiksha Ramchandra Chaudhari ...Applicant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
_______
None for Applicant.
Ms Pooja M. J. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent-State.
_______
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATE: 31st AUGUST 2026
P.C.
1. None for the Applicant. It appears that the Applicant is not interested to
prosecute the Interim Application.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Digitally
signed by
AJIT
AJIT RAMESH
RAMESH PATHRIKAR
PATHRIKAR Date:
2026.09.01
11:09:38
+0530
Page 1 of 1
Ajit
Checking your session…