Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

TANAJI NAMDEO NIKATE AND ANRversusSACHIN LAXMAN MOHOL AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that condonation of delay is permissible and that substituted service by newspaper publication is allowed where personal service cannot be effected.

Summary

The petitioners filed two interim applications in Writ Petition No. 4320/2022. The first sought substitution of the names of the legal representatives of Respondent No.13 and condonation of a 1,213‑day delay. The second sought substituted service of Respondents Nos.9 and 14 by newspaper publication after attempts at personal service failed due to insufficient address details. The Court, applying Order V Rule 20 of the CPC, permitted service on the legal heirs of Respondent No.13 by private as well as regular mode and allowed the petitioners to file an affidavit of service. It also authorized substituted service on Respondents 9 and 14 by publishing a notice in the "Daily Sakal" (Pune edition). Both interim applications were disposed in favour of the petitioners, and the main petition was listed for further hearing on 22 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court can condone a delay of 1,213 days for substitution of legal representatives of a respondent.
  • Whether substituted service by newspaper publication is permissible under Order V Rule 20 of the CPC when personal service is ineffective.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • substitution of legal representatives
  • condonation of delay
  • substituted service
  • newspaper publication
  • Order V Rule 20 CPC
  • interim application

Judgment

                             KVM
                                                               1/3
                                                                                   54 - WP 4320 OF 2022.doc



                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          Digitally signed
          by KANCHAN
KANCHAN   VINOD
          MAYEKAR
VINOD
MAYEKAR
          Date:
          2026.09.09
          19:06:01
          +0530
                                                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                WRIT PETITION NO. 4320/2022
                                                        ALONGWITH
                                             INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7048/2026
                                                        ALONGWITH
                                             INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7049/2026
                                                            IN
                                                WRIT PETITION NO. 4320/2022

                             MR. TANAJI NAMDEO NIKATE & ANR.                   ….. PETITIONERS/
                                                                               APPLICANTS

                                   VS

                             MR. SACHIN LAXMAN MOHOL & ORS.                    ….. RESPONDENTS

                             Adv. S. S. Patwardhan i/b. Adv. Mrinal A. Shelar for the
                             Petitioners/Applicants.

                             Adv. Nikhilesh Pote for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 7.

                             Adv. Pramod Pawar for the Respondent Nos. 11 and 12.

                                                      CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
                                                      DATE : 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2026

                             P.C. :-

                                             INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7048/2026

                             1)           This is an application filed for substitution of names of

                             the legal representatives of the respondent no.13 by condoning delay

                             of 1213 days.

                             2)           Issue notice to the proposed legal heirs of the respondent
KVM
                                    2/3
                                                        54 - WP 4320 OF 2022.doc


no.13 as mentioned in paragraph no.3 of the Interim Application,

returnable on 22nd September, 2026.

3)           The petitioners/applicants are permitted to effect service

upon the legal heirs, by private mode in addition to regular mode of

service and file an affidavit of service before next date.

                INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7049/2026

1)           This is an application under Order V Rule 20 of CPC, filed

by the petitioners seeking substituted service upon respondent nos. 9

and 14 by way of paper publication.

2)           Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the

petitioners have made all the attempts to serve respondent nos. 9 and

14 by sending notices on the addresses which are mentioned in their

‘Registered Address’ form submitted before the Trial Court, however,

the notices are returned with an endorsement of insufficient

addresses. He submits that the said respondents are residing on the

same addresses, but are avoiding service. He also states that the

petitioners/original plaintiffs have already stated in the plaint that

these respondents are formal parties and despite that they need to be

served since they are arrayed as parties to the petition.

3)           Considering the reasons mentioned in the application and

submissions advanced, the petitioners are permitted to serve the
KVM
                                  3/3
                                                      54 - WP 4320 OF 2022.doc


respondent nos. 9 and 14 by way of paper publication by publishing

notice in the newspaper ‘Daily Sakal’, Pune City edition.

4)          Interim Application is disposed of accordingly.



                   WRIT PETITION NO. 4320/2022

1)          List the matter for further consideration on 22 nd

September, 2026.



                                        [PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.]


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.