Bombay High Court

J. S. JOSHI (DECEASED) THR. LRS. SMT. JAYSHRI J. JOSHI (DECEASED) THR. LRS. 1A AND 1F AND ORS.versusDAYANANAD BABURAO CHOGLE (DECEASED) AND ORS.

Decided: 8 September 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The court quashed the Registrar's order and restored the Civil Revision Application, allowing the petitioner a further period to remove the objection.

Summary

The petitioner filed an interim application seeking restoration of a Civil Revision Application that had been dismissed for failure to remove an office objection. The Registrar (Judicial) had ordered the petitioner to remove the objection within two weeks, but the petitioner inadvertently missed the notice. The court considered the petitioner's explanation and quashed the Registrar's order dated 10 August 2026, thereby restoring the Civil Revision Application to the file. The interim application was disposed of, and the petitioner was given three weeks to comply with the office objection removal, after which the Registrar's order would stand. The matter was listed for hearing on 29 September 2026.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate remedy when a Civil Revision Application is dismissed due to non‑removal of an office objection?

Subjects

civil revision
office objection
restoration of application
interim application
quash order

Judgment

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7092 OF 2026
                              IN
         CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.17973 OF 2026


Sudesh Janardan Joshi & Ors.                              .. Petitioner

            Vs.
Prasad Vasant Chogle & Anr.                               .. Respondents


Adv. Jayesh Jayale, for the Applicant.


                                 CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
                                 Date : 8th SEPTEMBER 2026

P.C. :


1.       The application is filed seeking restoration of the Civil Revision

Application, which came to be dismissed on account of non-removal of

office objection.

2.       It is pointed out that the, Registrar (Judicial) by order dated 10 th

August 2026 directed Petitioner to remove office objection within two

weeks, failing which the Petition was liable to be dismissed. The Petitioner,

however, failed to remove office objections as he inadvertently failed to take

notice of the matter before the Registrar. Consequently, the Civil Revision

Application came to be dismissed upon noticing the dismissal, the present
                                      1/2
905.IA.7092.2026.doc                                           Sufiyan Syed - PA
application is filed, seeking restoration of the Civil Revision Application.

3.      Considering the reason given, the order of the Registrar (Judicial)

dated 10th August 2026 is quashed.

4.      The Interim Application is disposed of.

5.      The Civil Revision Application is restored to file.

6.      Three weeks time granted to remove office objections, failing which,

the order of the Registrar (Judicial) dated 10th August 2026 will stand

restored.

7.      List the Civil Revision Application on 29th September 2026.




                                                  (ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)




                                       2/2
905.IA.7092.2026.doc                                           Sufiyan Syed - PA

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…