Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD DIVISIONAL OFFICE KAVITA VAULTS COMPLEX TP HUB AURANGABADversusMAGANBHAI JIVANBHAI KUNKANA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court condoned the delay and restored the First Appeal to its original file.

Summary

The appellant, National Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an interim application seeking restoration of its First Appeal, which had been dismissed for failure to supply copies and for want of prosecution. The appellant argued that the omission was inadvertent, that the appeal contained substantive grounds that needed to be heard, and that the 223‑day delay in filing the restoration application was unintentional. The court noted that the appeal had been dismissed without any respondent appearing and that the appellant had a genuine desire to contest the matter on its merits. Considering the explanations offered, the court held that the delay could be condoned in the interest of justice. Consequently, the application was allowed, the appeal was restored to its original file, and the appellant was given four weeks to deposit the decretal amount with interest to keep the stay of execution in force.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 223 days in filing a restoration application can be condoned.
  • Whether an appeal dismissed for want of prosecution can be restored.
  • Whether the stay of execution can continue subject to deposit of the decretal amount.

Subjects

  • restoration of appeal
  • condonation of delay
  • interim application
  • civil procedure
  • execution proceedings
  • insurance claim

Judgment

                                                                     65-IA-7215-2026.doc

vaishnavi

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                           INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7215 OF 2026
                                             IN
                             FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 9963 OF 2025
                                            WITH
                             INTERIM APPLICATION 10317 OF 2025
                                   (Not on board. Taken on board)
                                             IN
                              FIRST APPEAL(ST) NO. 9963 OF 2025

            National Insurance Co Ltd
            Divisional Office Kavita Vaults
            Complex TP Hub Aurangabad                                 ...Appellant
                       V/s.
            Maganbhai Jivanbhai Kunkana                               ...Respondent


            Mr. Amol A. Gatne, for the Appellant/Applicant.

                              CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
                              DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
            P.C. :-

                         Interim Application No. 7215 of 2026:

            1.           This is an application for restoration of the First Appeal by

            condoning the delay of 223 days.

            2.           Heard the learned counsel for applicant. Since it is pointed

            out that the first appeal was dismissed for failure to supply copies and

            resulted nobody had appeared in the first appeal on behalf of

            respondents, the instant application is being considered even without

                                                1/3
                                                      65-IA-7215-2026.doc

issuing notices to the respondent.

3.         The learned counsel for applicant submits that the First

Appeal was filed on behalf of the insurance company and considering

the contentions in the first appeal, this court had passed an order on

29th July 2025 by which notice was issued to the respondents and the

impugned order was stayed subject to deposit of the entire decretal

amount along with accrued interest. He submits that after this order

was passed, the copies for effecting service upon the respondents were

not supplied inadvertently and as a result the appeal came to be

dismissed for want of prosecution.

4.         He submits that the appellant insurance company desires to

contest the   First Appeal on merits however, since the appeal is

already dismissed, the same could not be prosecuted and the

respondents have already initiated execution proceedings. He submits

that the appeal which was filed on several grounds needs to be heard

and decided on merits.

5.         As regards delay, it is submitted that the order dated 5 th

December 2025 passed by the Registrar - Judicial was inadvertently

not taken note of and after the dismissal was known, certain time is

consumed in the process of obtaining necessary approvals and

permissions. He therefore states that the delay of 223 days is

                                     2/3
                                                       65-IA-7215-2026.doc

unintentional and same be condoned in the interest of justice.

6.         Considering the reasons mentioned in the application and

submissions advanced, it appears that the appellant had raised certain

grounds in the appeal but the appeal remained to be decided on

merits. Since it is desirable that the appeal be decided on merits the

instant application for restoration needs to be allowed.

7.         Accordingly, the delay of 223 days in filing the restoration

application is condoned and the instant application is allowed. The

First Appeal be restored to its original file.

Interim Application No. 10317 of 2025 In First Appeal 9963 of 2025.

8.         The appellant is granted four weeks time to deposit the

entire decretal amount along with accrued interest before the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal and subject to this deposit, the impugned

order shall remain stayed.



                                          (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)




                                    3/3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.