Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Atmaram Ramchandra KurilversusRamsakal Jaiswar

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court condoned the delay, set aside the dismissal order, and restored the writ petition subject to removal of office objections within two weeks.

Summary

The petitioners filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay in filing a restoration application for their writ petition, which had been dismissed for non‑removal of office objections. The learned counsel stated that the office objections would be removed within two weeks. The Court, considering this statement, set aside the dismissal order dated 5 May 2026 and restored the writ petition, subject to the petitioners removing the objections within the stipulated period. The Court directed that if the objections are removed, the petition shall be listed as a fresh matter for admission; otherwise, the dismissal will stand. The interim application was consequently disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in filing the restoration application for the writ petition can be condoned
  • Whether the writ petition can be restored subject to removal of office objections within a specified time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • office objections
  • condonation of delay
  • restoration of petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                                           2 IA-7227-26.DOC

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7227 OF 2026
                                                   IN
                                   WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 7812 OF 2026

                   Atmaram Ramchandra Kuril & ors.                     ..Applicants/
                                                                          Petitioners
                           Versus

                   Ramsakal Jaiswar & ors.                            …Respondents


                   Mr. Sachin Hande, i/b Lexfort Associates, for the Applicants.


                                              CORAM :       N. J. JAMADAR, J.
                                              DATE    :     18th SEPTEMBER 2026

                   P.C.:
SAINATH
SANJAY
BODKHE
Digitally signed
by SAINATH
SANJAY BODKHE
                   1.      Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants.
Date: 2026.09.19
16:34:54 +0530




                   2.      Mr. Hande, the learned Counsel for the applicants, on

                   instructions, submits that, the office objections would be

                   removed within a period of two weeks.

                   3.      In view of the aforesaid statement and for the reasons

                   assigned in the application, the delay in taking out the

                   application for restoration of the WP(st)/7812/2026 which came

                   to be dismissed for non-removal of office objections, stands

                   condoned and the order dated 05 th May, 2026, dismissing the

                   writ petition for non-removal of office objections stands set aside

                   and WP(st)/7812/2026 stands restored to file subject to the

                   SAINATH, PA                        1/2
                                                        2 IA-7227-26.DOC

applicant removing the office objections within a period of two

weeks.

4.      In the event, the office objections are removed within the

said period, list the writ petition as a fresh matter for admission.

5.      In case, the office objections are not removed within the

said period of two weeks, this order shall stand recalled and the

WP(st)/7812/2026      shall   stand     dismissed   without   further

reference to the Court.

6.      The Interim Application stands disposed.



                                            [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]




SAINATH, PA                           2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.