Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MR. FATECHAND N RANKAversusPUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court allowed the interim application in terms of prayer clause (a).

Summary

The applicant, Mr. Fatehchand N. Ranka, filed an interim application in Writ Petition No. 6297 of 2023 against the Pune Municipal Corporation and others. The application sought relief as specified in prayer clause (a). The court heard arguments from counsel for both parties. Relying on the reasons set out in the applicant’s application, the bench allowed the interim application. The order grants the relief sought in prayer clause (a) pending the final disposal of the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the interim relief sought in prayer clause (a) of the application should be granted

Subjects

  • interim relief
  • writ petition
  • municipal corporation
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

               Digitally signed
               by ARUNA
     ARUNA     SANDEEP
     SANDEEP   TALWALKAR
     TALWALKAR Date:                                       502.IA7437.2026.odt
               2026.09.21
               18:51:03 +0530




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7437 OF 2026
                                    IN
                      WRIT PETITION NO.6297 OF 2023

Mr. Fatehchand N. Ranka.                           … Applicant.
      Versus
Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors.                  … Respondents

                          --------------
Mr. Rohan Mirpury, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. Manisha Jagtap, Advocate for Respondent/PMC.
                          --------------
                           CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
                                         SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                   DATE :    21st SEPTEMBER, 2026

P.C. :


1.            Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production

board.

2.            We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

3.            For the reasons mentioned in the application, the Interim

Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).



(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                           (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




Talwalkar                          1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.