Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KISHORE SHANKAR GARVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary

Petitioner Kishore Shankar Garve, through counsel Veer Kankaria, informed the Court that he no longer wishes to pursue the writ petition filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court, acting on this statement, dismissed the writ petition as not pressed. Consequently, any pending interim applications were also ordered to be disposed of. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. The order was pronounced by the Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait M. Sethna on 7 October 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground that the petitioner does not wish to press the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • not pressed
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

           Digitally signed
           by MAYUR
MAYUR    KONDIRAM
         ADANE
KONDIRAM Date:
ADANE    2026.10.08
           13:36:03
           +0530                                                                      62-WP-12508-2026.doc

     Mayur
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 12508 OF 2026
                                                           WITH
                                           INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7454 OF 2026


                              Kishore Shankar Garve                          ...Petitioner
                                      Versus
                              The State of Maharashtra
                              Thru Secretary And Ors.                        ...Respondents

                                                                 ...

                              Adv. Veer Kankaria, for the Petitioner.
                              Mrs. Neha S. Bhide, GP, a/w Adv. Shruti D. Vyas Addl. GP and
                              Mr.S. P. Kamble, AGP for Respondent No.1.

                                                                 ...


                                               CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. &
                                                       ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.


                                                DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2026.


                              P.C.:
                              1.      Mr. V. Kankaria, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner,

                              on instructions, submits that the Petitioner does not wish to press

                              the present Writ Petition and prays that the same may be disposed

                              as not pressed.


                              2.      In view of the statement made at the bar, the Writ Petition is



                                                                1/2
                                                      62-WP-12508-2026.doc


Dismissed as not pressed.


3.     In view of the disposal of the captioned Writ Petition, all

pending Interim Applications, if any, stand Disposed of accordingly.




     [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]                    [CHIEF JUSTICE]




                                 2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.