Bombay High Court
MOSHIN SALIM CHUNAWALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court granted a stay of the judgment and decree pending the appeal, having found the issues triable and the applicant in compliance with the deposit direction.
Summary
The applicant, Moshin Salim Chunawala, filed an interim application seeking a stay of the judgment and decree dated 1 September 2026 passed by the City Civil Court, Borivali, pending the hearing of his first appeal. He also requested continuation of earlier interim relief restraining the respondents from coercive action for recovery of an amount claimed under a demand notice issued under Section 174 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The trial court had earlier ordered the applicant to deposit 25% of the disputed amount, which the applicant complied with by depositing the sum and furnishing proof. The High Court, considering that the issues are triable in the appeal and that the applicant had complied with the deposit direction, granted a stay of the impugned judgment and decree. The interim application was allowed as prayed and disposed of without costs.
Issues considered
- Whether a stay of execution of the trial court's judgment and decree should be granted pending the hearing of the first appeal
- Whether compliance with the trial court's direction to deposit 25% of the disputed amount suffices to justify the stay
- Whether the earlier interim relief restraining coercive action can be continued pending the appeal
Legislation cited
- Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — s. 174
Subjects
- stay of execution
- interim relief
- appeal
- demand notice
- Maharashtra Land Revenue Code
- Civil Procedure
Judgment
506-IA-7561-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7561 OF 2026
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.1348 OF 2026
Moshin Salim Chunawala Applicant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra & Ors Respondents
_______
Adv. Ernest Tuscano for the Applicant.
Ms. Rashmi S. Tendulkar for the Respondent-State.
Digitally
PRIYANKA
signed by
PRIYANKA
MADHAVRAO
_______
MADHAVRAO KALE
KALE Date:
2026.09.24
19:24:51
+0530
CORAM: AARTI SATHE, J.
DATE: 24th SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C.
1. This Interim Application has been filed praying for following reliefs:
(a)stay the effect, operation, execution and implementation of the
impugned Judgemnt and Decree dated 1 September 2026 passed
by the Hon’ble City Civil Court, Borivali Division at Dindoshi,
Goregaon, Mumbai in Short Cause Suit No.458 of 2018,
pending the hearing and final disposal of the present First
Appeal;
(b) continue the interim relief granted by this Hon’ble
Court by its order dated 17 January 2026 passed in Appeal from
Order No.547 of 2025 alongwith Interim Application No.12539
of 2025, restraining the Respondents, their servants,
Page 1 of 3
Priyanka
506-IA-7561-2026.DOC
subordinates, officers and agents from taking any coercive action
and/or coercive steps against the Applicant for recovery of the
amount purportedly due undr the Demand Notice dated
22.11.2016 issued under Section 174 of the Maharashtra Land
Revenue Code, 1966, which interim relief has been continued by
the learned Trial Court for a period of four weeks from the date
of passing of the impugned Judgment, pending the hearing and
final disposal of the present First Appeal;
(c)pending the heairng and final disposal of the present Interim
Application, grant ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (a)
and (b) above;
(d) provide for the costs of the present Interim Application;
and
(e) pass such further and other order(s) and/or direction(s)
this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.
2. The First Appeal has been filed against the impugned Judgment and
Decree dated 1st September 2026 passed by the Hon'ble City Civil Court, Borivali
Division at Dindoshi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trial Court’) in Short Cause
Suit No.458 of 2018.
3. In the Appeal from Order No.547 of 2025 challenging the Order
passed on 29th March 2025 in Notice of Motion No.688 of 2018 in the said Suit,
it was directed that the Appellant deposit 25% of the disputed amount in the bill
Page 2 of 3
Priyanka
506-IA-7561-2026.DOC
dated 26th June 2015 and original demand Notice 22nd November 2016 or
furnish security of an equivalent value before the Trial Court within a period of 4
weeks from the date of the said Order.
4. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the
Applicant/Appellant that the said direction has been complied with and the 25%
disputed amount has been deposited in the Trial Court. He has placed on record a
receipt and demand draft evidencing payment of the same which is taken on record
and marked 'X' for identification.
5. Considering the issues involved in the First Appeal No.1348 of 2026,
the same are triable issues and also considering that the Applicant/Appellant had
deposited 25% of the amount as directed, this Court is of the view that the stay to
the effect, operation, execution and implementation of the impugned Judgment
and Decree dated 1st September 2026, be granted.
4. Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (c) and is
accordingly disposed of. No costs.
(AARTI SATHE, J.)
Page 3 of 3
Priyanka
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.