PRALHAD DNYANESHWAR DESHMUKHversusCONTROLLER OF UNAUTHORISED DEVELOPMENT (PUSHPAK NODE) CIDCO AND ORS

                                                                           (10)-IA-7605-26.doc


        PANCHAL
                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7605 OF 2026
                                                   IN
          Digitally
                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 7543 OF 2026
          signed by
          BALAJI
BALAJI    GOVINDRAO
GOVINDRAO PANCHAL
PANCHAL   Date:
          2026.09.30
          10:33:05
          +0530
                       Pralhad Dnyaneshwar Deshmukh                  ...Applicant/
                                                                        Org. Petitioner
                               Versus

                       The Controller of Unauthorised
                       Development (Pushpak Node) CIDCO & Ors.       ...Respondents
                                                     ...
                       Mr. Sanket Thakur, for the Applicant/Org. Petitioner.

                       Mr. Sameer Patil, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2-CIDCO.

                       Mrs. Neha S. Bhide, GP a/w Mr. K. B. Dighe, Addl. GP & Mrs.
                       M. P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 & 5 – State.
                                                   ...

                                   CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. &
                                           ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.

                                   DATE    : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2026

                       P.C.:
                       1.          Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant. The
                       learned Counsel for the Applicant fairly submits that due to
                       some unavoidable circumstances, steps could not be taken
                       well within time to rectify the objections/discrepancies as
                       highlighted by the Registry. He submits that within two weeks,
                       all such discrepancies shall be removed. The learned Counsel
                       for the Applicant further submits that the delay in filing this
                       Application may kindly be condoned.


                                                      1
                                                        (10)-IA-7605-26.doc




2.        The learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2
fairly has no objection to the above.



3.        For the reasons stated in the Interim Application,
delay in filing the Application is condoned. Accordingly,
Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) &
(b). The order dated 18 th June, 2026 stands recalled qua the
instant Writ Petition and the Writ Petition is restored to its
original file, subject to removal of all office objections/defects,
if any, within a period of two weeks from date of uploading of
this order.


4.        Respondents     may    file   Affidavits-in-Reply     within
three weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within one
week thereafter.


5.        Subject to compliance of the above by the Applicant,
list the Petition again on 30th October, 2026.




[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]                          [CHIEF JUSTICE]




                                 2