Bombay High Court
KISHOR SHRIMANT SURYAWANSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The Court allowed the interim application, condoned the delay, and restored the writ petition to the file.
Summary
Kishor Shrimant Suryawanshi filed Writ Petition (ST.) No. 13345 of 2026 which was dismissed because office objections were not removed. He subsequently filed Interim Application No. 7665 of 2026, thirty days after the dismissal, seeking restoration of the writ petition. The Court examined the reasons for the delay, found them satisfactory, and consequently condoned the delay. In the interest of justice, the Court ordered that the writ petition be restored to the file and that the office objections be removed. The interim application was therefore allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of thirty days in filing an interim application for restoration of a dismissed writ petition can be condoned.
- Whether the writ petition can be restored to the court’s file after condonation of delay.
Subjects
- interim application
- condonation of delay
- restoration of writ petition
- office objections
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- tribal development
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:40718-DB 911.IA7665_2026.DOC
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7665 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO. 13345 OF 2026
Kishor Shrimant Suryawanshi ... Applicant/Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary,
Tribal Development Department & Ors. ... Respondents
_______
Mr. Shrikrishna Chaudhari for the applicant/petitioner.
Ms. P.B. Chavan, AGP for the State.
_______
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATE: 6 OCTOBER 2026
P.C.
1. By this Interim Application, the applicant/petitioner is praying for
restoration of the Writ Petition, which was dismissed for non-removal of office
objections. There is a delay of 30 days in filing this Interim Application.
2. We have perused the averments as made in the Interim application. Delay
caused in filing this application has been appropriately and sufficiently explained,
hence the same is condoned. It is hence in the interest of justice that the Writ
Petition is restored to the file of this Court.
3. Accordingly, Interim Application is allowed. The Writ Petition is restored to
the file of this Court. Office objections be removed.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Signed by: Vidya S. Amin
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Page 1 of 1
Date: 07/10/2026 17:04:30
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.