Rajveer Knowledge Foundation Through Sushant PatilversusThe State of Maharashtra

                                                                          3.as.ia.7730.2026.doc




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7730 OF 2026
       Digitally
       signed by
       VINA
                                                    IN
VINA   ARVIND
ARVIND KHADPE                        CONTEMPT PETITION NO.73 OF 2025
KHADPE Date:
       2026.10.07
       15:30:44
       +0530
                    Rajveer Knowledge Foundation
                    through Sushant Patil                               … Applicant

                    In the matter between
                    Madhukar Genu Khondge and ors.                    … Petitioners
                           Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra and ors.                 … Respondents
                                                      ***
                    Mr. Rajesh Sahani for the Applicant / Original Respondent No.13.
                    Ms. Anita Chikane i/b. Mr. Amit Karkhanis for Respondent Nos. 2, 3,
                    4, 6,7,8,9 in CP No.73/2025.
                    Ms. Mamta S. Srivastava, AGP for Respondent – State.
                    Mr. S. A. Joshi for Respondent / Original Petitioners in CP.
                    Mr. Rahul Gaikwad i/b. Ms. Komal Singh Graiutas Legal for
                    Respondent No.12.
                    Mr. Sushant Patil – Applicant in-person present.
                                                      ***
                                                         CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.
                                                            DATE   : 7 OCTOBER, 2026
                    P.C. :

                    1.       Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the Application.

                    2.       The Application is filed by Respondent No.13 in the Writ
                    Petition, seeking condonation of delay in filing the Application and
                    cancellation of the bailable warrant issued against the Applicant and
                    its representative Mr. Sushant Patil.

                    3.       The Applicant has also made prayer clause (d) seeking recall /
                    modification of paragraph 2 of the order dated 02.04.2026 about


                    Vina Khadpe                             1
                                                       3.as.ia.7730.2026.doc




steps to be taken to reconvey the property in favour of the Petitioners.

4.     So far as this prayer clause (d) is concerned, learned Counsel
for the Petitioner as well as learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 to 9
seek time to file a Reply. Let the Reply be filed before next date, with
its copy served on the other side.

5.     It appears that despite service upon the present Applicant,
nobody appeared in the Contempt Petition and therefore, on
02.04.2026, bailable warrant was issued. Today, learned Counsel for
the Applicant states that the Applicant is present in the Court who is
duly identified by him.

6.     Considering that the Applicant is present in the Court and has
also engaged an Advocate, the Application is allowed in terms of
prayer clauses (b) and (c) thereby condoning the delay and canceling
the   bailable   warrant   issued    against   the   Applicant        and      its
representative, Mr. Sushant Patil.

7.     The Applicant and its representative are hereby directed to
remain present in the Court, if so required in future.

8.     For consideration of prayer clause (d), stand over to
28.10.2026.



                                                (M.M. SATHAYE, J.)




Vina Khadpe                            2