Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HITESH RAMPRAKASH YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court condoned the delay of 1151 days and allowed the interim application.

Summary

The applicant, Hitesh Ramprakash Yadav, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 1151‑day delay in filing a criminal revision application (No. 3736 of 2025). The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and another party, opposed the condonation. After hearing counsel for both sides, the Court considered whether such a lengthy delay could be justified under procedural law. The Court held that the delay could be condoned and allowed the interim application. Consequently, the revision application was ordered to be registered and the interim application was disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 1151 days in filing a criminal revision application can be condoned.

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • criminal revision
  • interim application
  • procedural law
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                                 6-IA-824-2025 (CR).doc


                      Shubhada S Kadam


                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 824 of 2025
                                                       in
                               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO. 3736 OF 2025

                      Hitesh Ramprakash Yadav                         ….Applicant
                      VERSUS
                      The State of Maharashtra and anr.               ….Respondents
                      _________________________________________________________________

                      Mr. Mithilesh Mishra i/b. Mr. Agastya Desai, Advocate for Applicant.
                      Mr. Prashant P. Jadhav, APP for Respondent-State.
                      Ms. Ashi Narayan, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
                      _________________________________________________________________

                                                           CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                           DATE         :   27th MARCH, 2026.
                      P.C. :

                      1.          Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP for

                      respondent No.1-State and learned counsel for respondent No.2.

                      2.          By this application, the applicant is seeking condonation of

                      delay of 1151 days’ for filing the revision application.

                      3.          Considering the submissions of all learned counsel, the delay of

                      1151 days’ is condoned. The interim application is allowed and disposed

                      of.

SHUBHADA
                      4.          The Registry to register the revision application of statistical
SHANKAR
KADAM
Digitally signed by
                      purpose.
SHUBHADA SHANKAR
KADAM
Date: 2026.04.02
12:53:03 +0530
                                                                      (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)


                                                        Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.