Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJESH RAM PARIANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court allowed the interim applications seeking leave to intervene, thereby permitting the intervenors to join the bail proceedings.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay heard interim applications (Nos. 880/2026 and 885/2026) filed by intervenors seeking permission to join bail application No. 191 of 2026 filed by Ashesh Shailesh Mehta against the State of Maharashtra. The court examined whether the intervenors could be allowed to participate in the bail proceedings. Finding no impediment, the court granted leave to intervene. Consequently, the interim applications were disposed of as allowed. The bail application was scheduled for further hearing on 23 September 2026 at 10:30 a.m.

Issues considered

  • Whether intervenors are entitled to be permitted to intervene in the bail application pending before the High Court

Subjects

  • bail
  • interim application
  • intervention
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

P.H. JAYANI                                            02 BA191.2026.DOC


        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 880 OF 2026
                              IN
                BAIL APPLICATION NO. 191 OF 2026

Rajesh Ram Pariani                                   …. Intervenor
In the matter between :-
Ashesh Shailesh Mehta                                 …. Applicant
      V/s.
The State of Maharashtra                             …Respondent

                              WITH
               INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 885 OF 2026
                               IN
                 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 191 OF 2026
                              WITH
                 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 191 OF 2026

Umesh Laltaprasad Singh and anr.                     …. Intervenors
In the matter between :-
Ashesh Shailesh Mehta                                 …. Applicant
      V/s.
The State of Maharashtra                             …Respondent


Mr. Ashok Mundargi, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Vinay Bhanushali,
Mr. Sanmit Vaze, Ms. Pravada Raut and Adv. Kaustubh Santosh
for the Applicant in BA/191/2026.
Mr. Vinit Kulkarni, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. Vivek Sharma i/b. Mr. Amandeep Singh for the Intrevenors.
Mr. Sunil Shinde, API, Unit – 08, EOW, Mumbai, present.
Mr. Manish Dhankar and Mr. Umesh Singh, Intervenors present
in person.


                            CORAM:       SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
                            DATED :      18th SEPTEMBER, 2026

P.C. :-

1.        Heard learned Counsel for the parties.



                                Page 1 of 2
       P.H. JAYANI                                                   02 BA191.2026.DOC



       2.             The Interim Application Nos.880/2026 and 885/2026
       seeking leave to intervene in the aforesaid Bail Application, are
       allowed.

       3.             Interim Application Nos.880/2026 and 885/2026 stand
       disposed of, accordingly.

       4.             List the aforesaid Bail Application on 23rd September, 2026
       at 10:30 a.m.



                                             (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
  PREETI
  HEERO
  JAYANI
Digitally signed by
PREETI HEERO
JAYANI
Date: 2026.09.22
10:53:15 +0530




                                            Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.