Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAGAR PARESH GOSALIYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court suspended the substantive sentence pending appeal, subject to the applicant furnishing a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with one or two sureties.

Summary

The applicant, Sagar Paresh Gosaliya, was convicted under IPC Sections 353 and 332 and sentenced to a short term of imprisonment with fines. The Sessions Court had already suspended the sentence pending appeal and granted interim bail. The applicant filed an interim application seeking further suspension of the substantive sentence while the appeal is pending, citing that he had already deposited the fine and was not misusing his liberty. The State opposed the application, fearing the applicant might abscond if released on bail. The High Court, noting the short term of the sentence, the applicant's prior bail, and lack of misconduct, ordered the suspension of the substantive sentence subject to a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with sureties, and directed the bail bonds to be filed before the Additional Sessions Judge. The application was therefore allowed and disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the substantive sentence should be suspended pending disposal of the appeal
  • Whether the applicant should be required to furnish a personal bond and sureties

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • suspension of sentence
  • interim bail
  • IPC 353
  • IPC 332
  • personal bond
  • criminal appeal

Judgment

                                                                                   94-IA-94-2026 IN APEAL-37-2026.doc



                             N.S.Kamble


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 94 OF 2026
                                                           IN
                                              CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2026


                             Sagar Paresh Gosaliya                                       … Applicant
                                   Versus
          Digitally signed
NILAM     by NILAM
          SANTOSH
SANTOSH   KAMBLE             State Of Maharashtra And Anr                                … Respondents
KAMBLE    Date: 2026.01.20
          11:31:09 +0530

                             ________________________________________________________
                             Mr.Himanshu R. More a/w Mr.Ashi Naryan h/f Mr.Prakash
                             Sabingikar, for the Applicant.
                             Mr.P.P. Jadhav, APP for Respondent-State.
                             ________________________________________________________
                                                              CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

                                                              DATE           : 17th JANUARY, 2026

                             P.C. :

                             .            This is an application for suspension of sentence.

                             2.           Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned

                             Additional Public Prosecutor.

                             3.           The Applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable

                             under Section 353 and 332 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’ for short).

                             The maximum sentence imposed on the Applicant for the offence



                                                               Page 1 of 3
                                                    94-IA-94-2026 IN APEAL-37-2026.doc



N.S.Kamble


punishable under Section 353 is two years with fine of Rs.5,000/- and

Section 332 is one year and simple imprisonment (‘SI’ for short) with

fine of Rs.2,500/-. The learned Sessions Court has suspended the

sentence during the appeal period and has granted interim bail to the

Applicant.

4.           During the trial the Applicant was on bail. The Applicant

has deposited the fine amount. It may take time to dispose of the

Appeal. Hence, requested to allow the Application.

5.           The learned APP and learned counsel for Respondent No.2

strongly objected to allow the Application on the ground that if the

Applicant released on bail, he may abscond. Hence, requested to reject

the Application.

6.           Considering the submission of both learned counsel as well

as sentence imposed on the Applicant is short term sentence. During

trial Applicant was on bail.          He has not misused the liberty.

Considering these facts, the sentence is suspended till final disposal of

the Appeal.

7.           The Application is disposed of in the following terms.



                                  Page 2 of 3
                                                      94-IA-94-2026 IN APEAL-37-2026.doc



N.S.Kamble


                                 ORDER

             (i)      The    substantive       sentence    of     imprisonment

             awarded to the applicant is hereby suspended pending

             disposal of the appeal, subject to the applicant furnishing a

             PR bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two

             sureties in the like amount.

             (ii)     The bail bonds to be furnished before the learned

             Additional Sessions Judge.

             (iii)    The Criminal Application is disposed of.



                                               (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                 Page 3 of 3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.