Bombay High Court
SUNIL SHANKARRAO BEDAGKAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ORS
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The court allowed the interim application in terms of prayer clause (a).
Summary
Sunil Shankarrao Bedagkar filed an interim application before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The application sought relief as outlined in prayer clause (a). The court heard the matter on 23 January 2026. After considering the submissions, the judges found merit in the applicant's prayer clause (a). Consequently, the interim application was allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
Issues considered
- Whether the interim relief sought by the applicant should be granted
Subjects
- interim relief
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- high court
Judgment
ia-.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.9777 OF 2024
Mr. Sunil Shankarrao Bedagkar. ...Applicants
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents.
…..
None for the applicnats.
Mr. Surel Shah i/b. Adv. Manoj Patil, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Shankar Katkar, Advocate for respondent No.5.
Mr. R. P. Kadam, AGP for respondent-State in WP/5506/2024.
Mr. A. P. Vanarase, AGP for respondent-State in WP/8794/2024.
Mr. A. M. Kulkarni a/w. Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, Advocate for
respondent nos. 7 & 8.
…..
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND
AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.
DATE : 23rd JANUARY, 2026.
P.C:
1. Heard.
2. For the reasons stated in application, the same is allowed in
terms of prayer clauses (a).
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] [ R.G. AVACHAT J.]
1 of 1
adn
Checking your session…