Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHANTILAL CHANDMAL LALWANI (DECEASED) THR. LRS. SMT. KALPANA RAJENDRA DAGA AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER) AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court allowed the interim application.

Summary

The applicants, represented by the heirs of the deceased Shantilal Chandmal Lalwani, filed an interim application in First Appeal (ST.) No.20067 of 2023 against the State of Maharashtra (Special Land Acquisition Officer). The application sought relief as specified in prayer clauses (a) and (b). The High Court, after considering the submissions, found no impediment to granting the interim relief. Accordingly, the Court allowed the application. The order disposes of the interim application, granting the relief sought.

Issues considered

  • Whether the interim relief sought in prayer clauses (a) and (b) should be granted by the High Court

Subjects

  • interim relief
  • civil appeal
  • land acquisition
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                86-IA-9828-2024.doc


                        Vivekanand
                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           Digitally
           signed by
           VIVEKANAND
VIVEKANAND RAJENDRA
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
RAJENDRA   BONDE
BONDE      Date:
           2026.09.01
           18:35:44
           +0530
                                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9828 OF 2024
                                                        IN
                                       FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.20067 OF 2023

                        Shantilal Chandmal Lalwani (Deceased)
                        Thr. Lrs. Smt. Kalpana Rajendra Daga
                        And Ors.                                      … Applicants.
                                    V/s.
                        The State Of Maharashtra (Special Land
                        Acquisition Officer) And Anr.                 … Respondents

                        Mr. Bipin Avdesh Singh i/b Adv. P. N. Joshi, for the
                        Applicants.



                                                     CORAM      : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                                                     DATED      : SEPTEMBER 1, 2026
                        P.C.:

                        1.      For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed
                        in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b).

                        2.      The application is allowed and disposed of.


                                                                      (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                                                           1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.