Bombay High Court
THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusK. NARSIMHAN RAO AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The two‑day delay is condoned and the writ petition is restored, subject to removal of office objections within a week.
Summary
Universal Sompo General Insurance Co. Ltd filed an interim application seeking condonation of a two‑day delay in filing a restoration application for its writ petition (ST) No. 30729 of 2025, which had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections. The Court examined whether such a short delay could be excused in the interest of substantive justice. It held that the delay was condonable and set aside the dismissal order, thereby restoring the writ petition to file. The Court conditioned the restoration on the petitioner removing the office objections within one week, after which the petition will be listed for admission on 1 September 2026. If the objections are not removed within the stipulated period, the restoration order will be recalled and the petition dismissed. The interim application was consequently disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether a two‑day delay in filing a restoration application can be condoned.
- Whether the writ petition dismissed for non‑removal of office objections can be restored.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- restoration of petition
- office objections
- civil procedure
- writ petition
Judgment
8 IA-983-26.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 983 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 30729 OF 2025
Universal Sompo General Insurance Co.Ltd. ..Applicant
Versus
K. Narsimhan Rao & anr. …Respondents
Ms. Kalpana Trivedi, for the Applicant/Petitioner.
Mr. K Narsimhan Rao, Respondent No.1-in-person.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATE : 24th August 2026
SAINATH
SANJAY
P.C.:
BODKHE
Digitally signed
by SAINATH
SANJAY BODKHE
Date: 2026.08.25
12:57:51 +0530
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the
Respondent No.1-in-person.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the
application for restoration of the petition which came to be
dismissed for non-removal of office objections and to restore the
WP(st)/30729/2025 to file.
3. For the reasons assigned in the application and to
advance the cause of substantive justice, the delay of 2 days in
taking out the application for restoration of the petition, stands
condoned, and the order dated 12th November, 2025 dismissing
SAINATH, PA 1/2
8 IA-983-26.DOC
the WP(st)/30729/2025 for non-removal of office objections
stands set aside and WP(st)/30729/2025 stands restored to
file.
4. If the petitioner removes the office objections within a
period of one week, list the WP(st)/30729/2025 for admission
on 01st September, 2026, as a fresh matter..
5. If the office objections are not removed within the said
period of one week, this order shall stand recalled and
WP(st)/30729/2025 stand dismissed without further reference
to the Court.
6. The Interim Application stands disposed.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
SAINATH, PA 2/2
Checking your session…