Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HAFEEZ S. CONTRACTORversusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-17(1), MUMBAI

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The appellant, Hafeez S. Contractor, filed an income‑tax appeal (IT No. 157 of 2020) against the Assistant Commissioner of Income‑Tax, Circle‑17(1), Mumbai. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel informed the court that subsequent developments had rendered the appeal infructuous and that the appellant wished to withdraw it. The court considered the request and, noting the appellant's instruction to withdraw, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the tax dispute were addressed. The order was passed without any direction as to costs. The judgment is purely procedural, confirming the withdrawal of the appeal.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • income tax appeal
  • procedural dismissal
  • tax litigation

Judgment

                                                                                                                                 30. ITXA-157-2020.doc
                                                                                                             Hafeez vs. The Assistant Commissioner of IT




                                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                                       INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 157 OF 2020

                                Hafeez S. Contractor                                                                ..        Appellant
             Digitally signed
             by SHUBHAM
                                       V/s.
SHUBHAM      SHESHRAO
SHESHRAO     GADHAVEPATIL
GADHAVEPATIL Date:              The Assistant Commissioner
             2026.08.20
             20:12:51 +0530
                                of Income-Tax Circle-17(1), Mumbai                                                  ..        Respondent

                                                       ______________________________________
                                Ms. Dinkle Hariya a/w Ms. Sruti Kalyankar i/b Ms. Namrata Kasale for Appellant.
                                Ms. Mamta Omle for Respondent.
                                              _______________________________________
                                                                      CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA AND
                                                                                                 FARHAN P. DUBASH, JJ.

                                                                      DATE                 : 19th AUGUST 2026

                                P.C.:

                                1.         Mentioned, at the request of the Appellant. Taken out of turn.

                                2.         The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Appellant – Assessee

                                           states that, due to subsequent developments, the above Appeal has been

                                           rendered infructuous. She therefore has instructions to withdraw the same.

                                3.         In view of the aforesaid statement, the above Appeal is dismissed as

                                           withdrawn with no order as to costs.



                                         ( FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. )                                           ( B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.)
                                Shubham Gadhavepatil




                                                                                Page 1 of 1
                                                                    -------------------------------------
                                                                     Order dated 19th August 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.