Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ROSHANI RAVI CHANDLAversusRaghunath Singh Chandla (deceased)

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court accepted the petition and issued an order.

Summary

The petition (Testamentary Petition No. 1515 of 2016) was filed by Roshani Ravi Chandla in the High Court of Bombay. The respondent in the matter was the deceased Raghunath Singh Chandla. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Kanhaiya S. Yadav and Mr. Akhilesh Adhav. The case was heard by Justice Arif S. Doctor. The court issued an order which was accepted and signed separately.

Subjects

  • testamentary
  • succession
  • intestate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                      1/1               29-JOT-165-2026 (OS).DOC



                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
         Digitally
         signed by
         MOHAMMAD
MOHAMMAD AREEB
                               TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
AREEB    MOHD
MOHD     AKBAR
AKBAR    Date:
         2026.09.10
         17:50:07
         +0530
                                      JUDGES ORDER NO. 165 OF 2026
                                                      IN
                                TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1515 OF 2016


          Roshani Ravi Chandla                                                     ...Petitioner
                      Versus
          Raghunath Singh Chandla (Deceased)                                       ...Respondent
                                                   _______
          Mr. Kanhaiya S. Yadav a/w Mr. Akhilesh Adhav for the Petitioner.
                                                   _______
                                         CORAM         :     ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
                                         DATE          :     8th SEPTEMBER, 2026


          P.C.


          1.          Judges Order is accepted and signed separately.




                                                               [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]




          Areeb


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.