Bombay High Court
Shivani Irappa AdargunchiversusIrappa Yellappa Adargunchi
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The petition for judicial separation is transferred from the Family Court, Nanded to the Family Court, Pune.
Summary
The applicant, Shivani Irappa Adargunchi, filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking the transfer of a Hindu Marriage Petition (judicial separation) filed by her husband from the Family Court at Nanded to the Family Court at Pune. The husband initially opposed the transfer, arguing that the petition listed two addresses for the wife, one in Pune and one in Nanded, but later confirmed that the wife resides in Pune. The court noted the considerable distance of about 450 km between the two courts, the wife’s lack of income, and the fact that she had also filed a proceeding under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act before the JMFC in Pune. No application was made to transfer the domestic‑violence proceeding. Accordingly, the court allowed the transfer of the judicial separation petition to Pune and permitted the husband to appear via video‑conferencing if he so applied.
Issues considered
- Whether a petition for judicial separation filed in one family court can be transferred to another family court under Section 24 CPC on the ground of the respondent's residence and convenience.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- Section 24 CPC
- transfer of suit
- judicial separation
- family court jurisdiction
- domestic violence
- video conferencing
Judgment
1 927-MCA-112-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
927 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 112 OF 2026
Shivani Irappa Adargunchi
VERSUS
Irappa Yellappa Adargunchi
…..
Mr. Govind Gangaram Suryawanshi, Advocate for Applicant.
…..
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 04 SEPTEMBER 2026
PER COURT :
1. The present Application is filed under Section 24 of the Code of
Civil Procedure seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.A-
109/2025 filed by husband for decree of judicial separation before the
learned Family Court, Nanded to learned Family Court, Pune.
2. Learned advocate for the respondent – husband had initially
opposed the transfer application stating that two addresses of the
applicant – wife are mentioned in the title clause, one is of Pune and the
other is of Nanded. However, at the request of this Court, the learned
advocate has taken instructions from the respondent – husband and on
instructions, he makes a statement that the applicant – wife is residing at
Pune.
3. The distance between two places are approximately 450 km. The
Applicant does not have source of income. She has also filed proceeding
Kiran Kawre
2 927-MCA-112-2026.odt
under the provision of Domestic Violence Act before the learned JMFC,
Pune. Although the said proceeding is filed subsequent to the Petition for
judicial separation filed by the Respondent, he has not moved an
Application for seeking transfer of the D. V. proceeding.
4. In view of above, the Application is allowed. The Petition being
HMP No. A-109/2025 for judicial separation filed by the Respondent is
transferred from file of learned Family Court, Nanded to file of learned
Family Court, Pune.
5. In the event the respondent - husband makes an application for
appearance through video-conferencing, the same may be considered
favorably and permission to appear through video-conferencing may be
granted on such dates and at such stages as is deemed appropriate by the
learned Family Court, Pune.
[ ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. ]
Kiran Kawre
Checking your session…