Bombay High Court
Ayesha Qamar BelimversusQamar Rafiq Belim
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- Y G KHOBRAGADE
Holding
The court held that the petition should be transferred to the Family Court, Parbhani, as the wife’s convenience and economic hardship warrant such a transfer.
Summary
Ayesha Qamar Belim, the applicant-wife, filed an application seeking transfer of the matrimonial proceeding (Petition No. B‑24 of 2025) from the Family Court in Pune to the Family Court in Parbhani. She alleged domestic violence, filed an FIR under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34, and claimed financial hardship and inconvenience in traveling 450 km to attend proceedings in Pune with her minor son. The non‑applicant did not oppose the transfer. The court, relying on the principles laid down in NCV Aishwarya v A.S. Sarvana Karthik Sha (2022) regarding Section 24 of the CPC, held that the wife’s convenience and economic considerations merit transfer. Consequently, the application was allowed and the petition was withdrawn from Pune and transferred to Parbhani for trial.
Issues considered
- The appropriateness of transferring the matrimonial proceeding from Pune to Parbhani under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
- Whether the applicant’s financial hardship and convenience justify such a transfer.
- The effect of the non‑applicant’s lack of opposition on the court’s decision.
Legislation cited
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 24
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 323, 34, 498-A, 504, 506
Subjects
- transfer of matrimonial suit
- Section 24 CPC
- domestic violence
- financial hardship
- family court jurisdiction
- Mohammadan law
- applicant convenience
Judgment
1 928mca214.25
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
928 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 214 OF 2025
AYESHA QAMAR BELIM
VERSUS
QAMAR RAFIQ BELIM
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jangada Suyashkumar Santosh
…
CORAM : Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.
DATE : 28.01.2026
PER COURT :
1. Heard the learned counsel Mr. Jangada, appearing for the
applicant at length.
2. Though the learned counsels Ms. Sada Khatoon Shaikh, Mr.
Mohammad Azaruddin Shaikh and Mr. Abdulla B. Peerzade have filed
their Vakalatnamas on behalf of the non applicant, however, none
appeared.
3. By the present application, the applicant-wife prays for
transfer of matrimonial proceeding bearing petition No. B-24 of 2025
pending on the file of learned Family Court, Pune to the file of learned
Family Court, Parbhani, District Parbhani.
4. It is the contention of the applicant that, on 17.04.2019 her
marriage was solemnized with the non applicant and out of the said wed-
lock a mail child namely Raza, aged about 6 was blessed to them.
2 928mca214.25
However, she was ill-treated at the hands of the non applicant and his
family members. Ultimately, she was compelled to stay with her parents
at Parbhani. Therefore, on 12.08.2024 she lodged the First Information
Report against the present non applicant and her in-laws with Kotwali
Police station, Parbhani, for the offence punishable under Section 498-A,
323, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. However, non applicant
with an ulterior motive has filed a petition B-24 of 2025 under the
Mohammadan Law, before the Family Court, Pune seeking a decree of
divorce. The distance between the Pune and Parbhani is about 450
k.m., therefore, inconvenience is being causing to her to travel from
Parbhani to Pune with minor son. She is facing financial crisis and is
unable to incur expenses. However, even if she attends the proceeding
at Pune, in that event she would face lodging and boarding problem.
5. The non applicant has not resisted the present application
for transfer.
6. In NCV Aishwarya Vs. A.S. Sarvana Karthik Sha -2022, SCC
Online SC 1199 wherein, it has been held that:
“9. The cardinal principle for exercise of power under
Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends
of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal
or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever
Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer,
the Courts have to take into consideration the economic
soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the
spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of
life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the
3 928mca214.25
circumstances of both the parties in eking out their
livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are
seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing
socio- economic paradigm in the Indian society,
generally, it is the wife’s convenience which must be
looked at while considering transfer. ”
7. Therefore, considering the law law laid down in above cited
case, it would be just and proper to withdraw the Petition No.B-24 of
2025 from the file of learned Family Court, Pune and it be transferred to
the file of learned Family Court, Parbhani.
8. In view of the above discussion, the present application is
allowed.
9. The Petition No. B-24 of 2025 pending on the file of learned
Family Court, Pune is hereby withdrawn and transferred to the file of
learned Family Court, Parbhani for trial and disposal according to law.
10. The said order be communicated to both the Courts.
( Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.)
mahajansb/
Checking your session…