Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAKRUTI HARISH KAMBLEversusHARISH VISHNU KAMBLE

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The consent terms are valid and the application is disposed of as per those terms.

Summary

The applicant, Prakruti Harish Kamble, filed a miscellaneous civil application against the respondent, Harish Vishnu Kamble, in the Bombay High Court. Both parties, through their counsel, submitted consent terms dated 2 September 2026, which were signed by the parties and their advocates. The court examined the consent terms, found them to be legally valid and the undertakings therein acceptable. The judge recorded the consent terms on the court record, marking them with the date of filing. Consequently, the court disposed of the miscellaneous civil application in accordance with the consent terms.

Issues considered

  • Whether the consent terms submitted by the parties are legally valid and can be recorded as an order of the court

Subjects

  • consent order
  • miscellaneous civil application
  • court disposal
  • undertakings
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                       5-MCA-218-2025.docx


           rrpillai          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                         MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 218 OF 2025



                        Prakruti Harish Kamble                   …     Applicant
                             Vs.
                        Harish Vishnu Kamble                     …     Respondent


                        Mr. Nilesh Wable for the Applicant.
                        Ms. Kajal Gupta i/b. Mr. Ajit Mandlik for the Respondent.

                                               CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

                                               DATE :       2nd SEPTEMBER 2026

                        ORDER :


                        1.    Learned counsel for the parties have tendered consent

                        terms dated 2nd September 2026. The consent terms is

                        signed by the parties and the respective advocates. The

                        parties are present in court. They are identified by their

                        respective advocates. The parties confirm their signatures

                        and the contents of the consent terms to be true and correct.


                        2.    The consent terms dated 2 nd September 2026 is taken

                        on record and marked “X” with today’s date for identification.

           Digitally
           signed by    3.    I have perused the consent terms. The terms are legal
           RAJESHWARI
RAJESHWARI RAMESH
RAMESH     PILLAI
PILLAI     Date:
           2026.09.02
                        and valid. The assurances and undertakings recorded in the
           19:54:51
           +0530
                                                      1/2
                                             5-MCA-218-2025.docx


consent terms are accepted as undertakings to this court.


4.   The miscellaneous civil application is disposed of in

terms of the consent terms.


                                        [GAURI GODSE, J.]




                              2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.